Cost-effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate intensity steady-state (MISS) training in UK cardiac rehabilitation.
Albustami, M Hartfiel, N Charles, J M Powell, R Begg, B Birkett, S T Nichols, S Ennis, S Hee, S W Banerjee, P
Albustami, M
Hartfiel, N
Charles, J M
Powell, R
Begg, B
Birkett, S T
Nichols, S
Ennis, S
Hee, S W
Banerjee, P
Citations
Altmetric:
Affiliation
Other Contributors
Publication date
2023-09-18
Subject
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) compared to moderate intensity steady-state (MISS) training in people with coronary artery disease (CAD) attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR).
Citation
Albustami M, Hartfiel N, Charles JM, Powell R, Begg B, Birkett ST, Nichols S, Ennis S, Hee SW, Banerjee P, Ingle L, Shave R, McGregor G, Edwards RT. Cost-effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs Moderate Intensity Steady-State (MISS) Training in UK Cardiac Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep 18:S0003-9993(23)00529-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.005. Epub ahead of print.
Type
Article