Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: avoid or expedite? - a comparative cohort study
Mondragon, Maria Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Zaman, Shafquat Farquharson, Ja'quay Raja, Usman Ijaz, Arhum Singh-Ranger, Deepak
Mondragon, Maria
Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen
Zaman, Shafquat
Farquharson, Ja'quay
Raja, Usman
Ijaz, Arhum
Singh-Ranger, Deepak
Affiliation
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust; The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
Other Contributors
Publication date
2025-07-14
Subject
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for treating gall bladder stones (GBS), its safety in elderly patients is still questioned. This study aimed to assess the outcome of LC in patients 70 and older compared to younger patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 548 patients undergoing LC were evaluated retrospectively. Patients' demographics and post-operative complications were recorded. Furthermore, patients were divided according to the CEPOD into emergency and elective patients, and complications were recorded according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classifications. Data analysis was performed with SPSS software version 27.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into the elderly patients group (≥70 years of age, n = 185) and the young patients group (<70 years of age, n = 363). The ≥70-year-old group showed a significantly higher number of patients who required emergency admission with GBS symptoms (P = 0.001), emergency LC (P = 0.01) and conversion to open (P = 0.02). The two groups showed comparable post-operative complications: bile leak (P = 0.26), collection (P = 0.11) and re-operation (P = 0.60), post-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (P = 1.0), GBS pancreatitis (P = 0.33) and death (0.30). CD I-II complications were higher in the ≥ 70-year-old group compared to the <70-year-old group in elective (P = 0.01) and emergency (P = 0.03) LC. However, CD ≥3 complications were higher in the ≥70-year-old group than the <70-year-old group in the emergency LC (P = 0.01) and comparable in the elective LC (P = 0.12).
CONCLUSION: LC is safe and efficient in elderly patients. Elective LC should be expedited in elderly patients to avoid emergency admissions and emergency LC, which are associated with higher complication rates.
Citation
Mondragon M, Mohamedahmed AY, Zaman S, Farquharson J, Raja U, Ijaz A, Singh-Ranger D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: Avoid or expedite? - A comparative cohort study. J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jul 1;21(3):265-269. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_138_24. Epub 2025 Jul 14
Type
Article