Prevalence and risk factors for malignant nodal involvement in early esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma: results from the Multicenter Retrospective Congress Study (endosCopic resectiON, esophaGectomy or Gastrectomy For Early Esophagogastric Cancers).
Pucher, Philip H Rahman, Saqib A Bhandari, Pradeep Blencowe, Natalie Chidambaram, Swathikan Crosby, Tom Evans, Richard Pt Griffiths, Ewen A Kamarajah, Sivesh K Markar, Sheraz R
Pucher, Philip H
Rahman, Saqib A
Bhandari, Pradeep
Blencowe, Natalie
Chidambaram, Swathikan
Crosby, Tom
Evans, Richard Pt
Griffiths, Ewen A
Kamarajah, Sivesh K
Markar, Sheraz R
Citations
Altmetric:
Affiliation
Other Contributors
Publication date
2024-09-02
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify LNM risk and outcomes following treatment of early esophago-gastric (EG) adenocarcinoma.
Background: The standard of care for early T1N0 EG cancer is endoscopic resection (ER). Radical surgical resection is recommended for patients perceived to be at risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Current models to select organ-preserving vs. surgical treatment are inconsistent.
Methods: CONGRESS is a UK-based multicentre retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with clinical or pathological T1N0 EG adenocarcinoma from 2015-2022 were included. Outcomes and rates of LNM were assessed. Cox regression was performed to assess the impact of prognostic and treatment factors on overall survival.
Results: 1,601 patients from 26 centres were included, with median follow-up 32 months(IQR 14-53). 1285/1612(80.3%) underwent ER, 497/1601(31.0%) underwent surgery. Overall rate of LNM was 13.5%. On ER staging, tumour depth (T1bsm2-3 17.6% vs. T1a 7.1%), lymphovascular invasion (17.2% vs. 12.6%), or signet cells (28.6% vs. 13.0%) were associated with LNM. In multivariable regression analysis, these were not significantly associated with LNM rates or survival. Adjusting for demographic and tumour variables, surgery after ER was associated with significant survival benefit, HR 0.33(0.15-0.77),P=0.010.
Conclusion: This large multicentre dataset suggests that early EG adenocarcinoma is associated with significant risk of LNM. This data is representative of current real clinical practice with ER-based staging, and suggests previously held beliefs regarding reliability of predictive factors for LNM may need to be reconsidered. Further research to identify patients who may benefit from organ-preserving vs. surgical treatment is urgently required.
Citation
Pucher PH, Rahman SA, Bhandari P, Blencowe N, Chidambaram S, Crosby T, Evans RPT, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK, Markar SR, Trudgill N, Underwood TJ, Gossage JA; CONGRESS collaborative. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Malignant Nodal Involvement in Early Esophago-Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Results From the Multicenter Retrospective Congress Study (endosCopic resectiON, esophaGectomy or Gastrectomy for Early Esophagogastric Cancers). Ann Surg. 2025 Mar 1;281(3):363-370. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006496. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
Type
Article