Treatment planning and delivery practice of lung SBRT: Results of the 2022 ESTRO physics survey.
Carver, Antony Scaggion, Alessandro Jurado-Bruggeman, Diego Blanck, Oliver Dalqvist, Emmy Romana Giglioli, Francesca Jenko, Aljasa Karlsson, Kristin Staykova, Vanya Swinnnen, Ans
Carver, Antony
Scaggion, Alessandro
Jurado-Bruggeman, Diego
Blanck, Oliver
Dalqvist, Emmy
Romana Giglioli, Francesca
Jenko, Aljasa
Karlsson, Kristin
Staykova, Vanya
Swinnnen, Ans
Citations
Altmetric:
Affiliation
Other Contributors
Publication date
2024-05-01
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background and purpose: The use of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in lung cancer is increasing. However, there is no consensus on the most appropriate treatment planning and delivery practice for lung SBRT. To gauge the range of practice, quantify its variability and identify where consensus might be achieved, ESTRO surveyed the medical physics community.
Materials and methods: An online survey was distributed to ESTRO's physicist membership in 2022, covering experience, dose and fractionation, target delineation, dose calculation and planning practice, imaging protocols, and quality assurance.
Results: Two-hundred and forty-four unique answers were collected after data cleaning. Most respondents were from Europe the majority of which had more than 5 years' experience in SBRT. The large majority of respondents deliver lung SBRT with the VMAT technique on C-arm Linear Accelerators (Linacs) employing daily pre-treatment CBCT imaging. A broad spectrum of fractionation schemes were reported, alongside an equally wide range of dose prescription protocols. A clear preference was noted for prescribing to 95% or greater of the PTV. Several issues emerged regarding the dose calculation algorithm: 22% did not state it while 24% neglected to specify the conditions under which the dose was calculated. Contouring was usually performed on Maximum or Average Intensity Projection images while dose was mainly computed on the latter. No clear indications emerged for plan homogeneity, complexity, and conformity assessment. Approximately 40% of the responders participated in inter-centre credentialing of SBRT in the last five years. Substantial differences emerged between high and low experience centres, with the latter employing less accurate algorithms and older equipment.
Conclusion: The survey revealed an evident heterogeneity in numerous aspects of the clinical implementation of lung SBRT treatments. International guidelines and codes of practice might promote harmonisation.
Citation
Carver A, Scaggion A, Jurado-Bruggeman D, Blanck O, Dalqvist E, Romana Giglioli F, Jenko A, Karlsson K, Staykova V, Swinnnen A, Warren S, Mancosu P, Jornet N. Treatment planning and delivery practice of lung SBRT: Results of the 2022 ESTRO physics survey. Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jul;196:110318. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110318. Epub 2024 May 1.
Type
Article