Enhancing documentation standards of complications in informed consent for neck of femur fracture surgery
Shahbaz, Aaisha Shahbaz, Rohma Dinesh, Yash Imami, Fahad Akbar, Rizwan Bose, Deepa
Shahbaz, Aaisha
Shahbaz, Rohma
Dinesh, Yash
Imami, Fahad
Akbar, Rizwan
Bose, Deepa
Affiliation
Other Contributors
Publication date
2025-11-06
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background: Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a major cause of morbidity in the United Kingdom. Operative management is the standard of care, and informed consent is essential to ensure patients understand potential benefits and complications arising during the surgical management of NOF fractures. This study aimed to assess and enhance the quality of Consent Form 1 documentation of complications of NOF fracture surgery as per the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and to assess improvements following focused interventions.
Methodology: A closed-loop audit was conducted in the Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, from February to October 2024. In the first cycle, we analyzed the Consent Form 1 retrospectively for the documentation of complications. Interventions for improvement were performed, including teaching sessions and posters on consent documentation. The second cycle assessed post-intervention practice. The study encompassed patients with capacity who underwent fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip replacement (THR). Documentation was considered complete if it included all common, less common, and rare complications.
Results: The initial documentation rates were modest, with fewer than 50% of forms recording pain, catheterization, avascular necrosis, hip stiffness, limb length discrepancy, and mortality. Post-intervention improvements were observed, including pain, avascular necrosis, and death for NOF fixation, alongside better values of infection, altered wound healing, pulmonary embolism, and bone damage for hemiarthroplasty. For THR, improvements were seen in the documentation of bleeding, dislocation, blood clots, prosthetic wear, infections, altered wound healing, bone damage, and death.
Conclusions: Targeted teaching and visual reminders improved documentation, but there are persistent gaps. Further strategies are required to standardize consent practices and ensure complete patient information in line with BOA guidance.
Citation
Shahbaz A, Shahbaz R, Dinesh Y, Imami F, Akbar R, Bose D. Enhancing Documentation Standards of Complications in Informed Consent for Neck of Femur Fracture Surgery. Cureus. 2025 Nov 6;17(11):e96220. doi: 10.7759/cureus.96220.
Type
Article