Women's experiences of induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic : a cross-sectional survey
Cross-Sudworth, Fiona Taylor, Beck Davidson, Louisa Quinn, Laura Wright, Joselle Vitue, Ella Kenyon, Sara
Cross-Sudworth, Fiona
Taylor, Beck
Davidson, Louisa
Quinn, Laura
Wright, Joselle
Vitue, Ella
Kenyon, Sara
Citations
Altmetric:
Affiliation
University of Birmingham; University of Warwick; Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Birmingham Heartlands Hospital; Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust
Other Contributors
Publication date
2023-10
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background/Aims Induction of labour is an increasingly common intervention. This study's aim was to explore women's experiences of induction, in particular of decision making and choice. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out with women who were induced with live, term infant(s) in two urban trusts. Their experiences were assessed using a postal survey that included the birth satisfaction scale and open questions on women's experiences. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to test for associations between aspects of the induction process and women's characteristics (age, parity, ethnic group). Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results Half (52.9%) of the respondents reported waiting to start induction. The majority felt sufficiently involved in decision making (62.1%) and choice (59.6%). Most reported having enough information about the reason for (82%) and process of (83%) induction. The qualitative themes were emotional response, communication, feeling unheard, quality of care and the negative impact of COVID-19 policies. Conclusions Women's overall experiences were positive. Improvements should focus on reducing delays to induction.
Citation
Cross-Sudworth, F. et al. (2023) ‘Women’s experiences of induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey’, British Journal of Midwifery, 31(10), pp. 548–557.
Type
Article