Risk of Revision and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Primary UKR Performed Using Computer Navigation or Patient-Specific Instrumentation: An Analysis of National Joint Registry Data.
Craig, P Gallacher, D Griffin, J Kozdryk, J Mason, J Wall, P D H Wilkinson, J M Metcalfe, A
Craig, P
Gallacher, D
Griffin, J
Kozdryk, J
Mason, J
Wall, P D H
Wilkinson, J M
Metcalfe, A
Affiliation
Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, England, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, United Kingdom; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, England, United Kingdom; The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom; School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, United Kingdom
Other Contributors
Publication date
2025-06-19
Subject
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background: Computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation in unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR)
improve the precision of implant positioning, but there is limited information regarding their impact on implant survival and
patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to compare postoperative implant survival, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) values, health related quality of life (measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimension 3-level version [EQ-5D-3L]), and intraoperative complications
between UKRs performed using computer navigation or patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation
Citation
J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.01483.
Type
Article