Assessing spinal movement during four extrication methods: a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers.
Nutbeam, Tim Fenwick, Rob May, Barbara Stassen, Willem Smith, Jason E Bowdler, Jono Wallis, Lee Shippen, James
Nutbeam, Tim
Fenwick, Rob
May, Barbara
Stassen, Willem
Smith, Jason E
Bowdler, Jono
Wallis, Lee
Shippen, James
Citations
Altmetric:
Affiliation
Other Contributors
Publication date
2022-01-15
Subject
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background: Motor vehicle collisions are a common cause of death and serious injury. Many casualties will remain in their vehicle following a collision. Trapped patients have more injuries and are more likely to die than their untrapped counterparts. Current extrication methods are time consuming and have a focus on movement minimisation and mitigation. The optimal extrication strategy and the effect this extrication method has on spinal movement is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the movement at the cervical and lumbar spine for four commonly utilised extrication techniques.
Methods: Biomechanical data was collected using inertial Measurement Units on 6 healthy volunteers. The extrication types examined were: roof removal, b-post rip, rapid removal and self-extrication. Measurements were recorded at the cervical and lumbar spine, and in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) planes. Total movement (travel), maximal movement, mean, standard deviation and confidence intervals are reported for each extrication type.
Results: Data from a total of 230 extrications were collected for analysis. The smallest maximal and total movement (travel) were seen when the volunteer self-extricated (AP max = 2.6 mm, travel 4.9 mm). The largest maximal movement and travel were seen in rapid extrication extricated (AP max = 6.21 mm, travel 20.51 mm). The differences between self-extrication and all other methods were significant (p < 0.001), small non-significant differences existed between roof removal, b-post rip and rapid removal. Self-extrication was significantly quicker than the other extrication methods (mean 6.4 s).
Conclusions: In healthy volunteers, self-extrication is associated with the smallest spinal movement and the fastest time to complete extrication. Rapid, B-post rip and roof off extrication types are all associated with similar movements and time to extrication in prepared vehicles.
Citation
Nutbeam T, Fenwick R, May B, Stassen W, Smith JE, Bowdler J, Wallis L, Shippen J. Assessing spinal movement during four extrication methods: a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 15;30(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-00996-5
Type
Article