Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients
Quinn, Laura Veenith, Tonny Bion, Julian Hemming, Karla Whitehouse, Tony Lilford, Richard
Quinn, Laura
Veenith, Tonny
Bion, Julian
Hemming, Karla
Whitehouse, Tony
Lilford, Richard
Citations
Altmetric:
Affiliation
University of Birmingham; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Other Contributors
Publication date
24/09/2022
Subject
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of early vs late tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients suggest that early tracheostomy reduces the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, but does not reduce short-term mortality or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Meta-analysis of randomised trials is typically performed using a frequentist approach, and although reporting confidence intervals, interpretation is usually based on statistical significance. To provide a robust basis for clinical decision-making, we completed the search used from the previous review and analysed the data using Bayesian methods to estimate posterior probabilities of the effect of early tracheostomy on clinical outcomes.
Methods: The search was completed for RCTS comparing early vs late tracheostomy in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library in June 2022. Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcomes short-term mortality, VAP, duration of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation. A Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with uninformative priors. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals were reported alongside posterior probabilities for any benefit (RR<1; SMD<0), a small benefit (number needed to treat, 200; SMD<-0.5), or modest benefit (number needed to treat, 100; SMD<-1).
Results: Nineteen RCTs with 3508 patients were included. Comparing patients with early vs late tracheostomy, the posterior probabilities for any benefit, small benefit, and modest benefit, respectively, were: 99%, 99%, and 99% for short-term mortality; 94%, 78%, and 51% for VAP; 97%, 43%, and 1% for duration of mechanical ventilation; and 97%, 75%, and 27% and for length of ICU stay.
Conclusions: Bayesian meta-analysis suggests a high probability that early tracheostomy compared with delayed tracheostomy has at least some benefit across all clinical outcomes considered.
Citation
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Nov;129(5):693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Type
Article