Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorAlbutt, Nichola
dc.contributor.authorHamid, Aisha
dc.contributor.authorWharton, Helen
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Sarita
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T15:33:45Z
dc.date.available2023-07-05T15:33:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-20
dc.identifier.citationThomas K, Albutt N, Hamid A, Wharton H, Jacob S. Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years. Eye (Lond). 2023 Dec;37(17):3661-3665. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02577-x. Epub 2023 May 20.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1476-5454
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41433-023-02577-x
dc.identifier.pmid37210455
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1183
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the incidence of referable diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients aged 80 and 85 years to determine whether screening interval can be extended safely in this age group. Methods: Patients who were aged 80 and 85 years when they attended digital screening during April 2014-March 2015 were included. Screening results at baseline and over the next four years were analysed. Results: 1880 patients aged 80 and 1105 patients aged 85 were included. Patients referred to hospital eye service (HES) for DR ranged from 0.7% to 1.4% in the 80-year-old cohort over 5 years. In this cohort a total of 76 (4%) were referred to HES for DR, of which 11 (0.6%) received treatment. Over the course of the follow up (FU), 403 (21%) died. In the 85-year-old cohort, referral to HES for DR each year ranged from 0.1% to 1.3%. In this cohort a total of 27 (2.4%) were referred to HES for DR, of which 4 (0.4%) received treatment. Over the course of follow-up 541(49%) died. All treated cases were for maculopathy in both cohorts and there were no cases of proliferative diabetic retinopathy requiring treatment. Conclusion: This study showed that the risk of progression of retinopathy is quite low in this age group and only a small proportion of patients developed referable retinopathy requiring treatment. This suggests relooking at the need for screening and ideal screening intervals in patients aged 80 years and over with no referable DR as they can be potentially classed as a group with low risk of sight loss.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.nature.com/eyeen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1476/en_US
dc.rights© 2023. Crown.
dc.subjectDiseases & disorders of systemic, metabolic or environmental originen_US
dc.titleFive-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleEye
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorJacob, Sarita
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleAdditional Professional Scientific and Technical Fielden_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record