Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStevens, Barry
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-06T15:55:07Z
dc.date.available2023-07-06T15:55:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.citationStevens B. J. (2020). An analysis of the structure and brevity of preliminary clinical evaluations describing traumatic abnormalities on extremity x-ray images. Radiography (London, England : 1995), 26(4), 302–307.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1078-8174
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2831
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radi.2020.02.010
dc.identifier.pmid32224096
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1196
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The preliminary clinical evaluation (PCE) system involves the radiographer providing an immediate comment highlighting an abnormality on the x-ray image. This can be a valuable service development though it must be recognised that the structure of the PCE may impede its usefulness. This study aimed to assess radiographers' ability to form a concise description of radiographic abnormalities by evaluating their structure and brevity. Method: A convenience sampling approach was used and the study was open to all radiographers (n = 48) in a United Kingdom (UK) hospital. Participants provided a PCE for 35 abnormal appendicular cases, which were assessed for the number of words used, lexical density and Gunning-Fog index; comparisons were made with a gold standard. PCE accuracy was evaluated with a scoring system and statistical analysis was completed with SPSS. Results: 21 participants took part. The mean (SD,range) words used was greater than the gold standard (9.5 (3.89,14.9) vs 5.6 (1.46,7)). The mean (SD,range) lexical density was lower than the gold standard (73.8 (4.02,20.1) vs 100 (0,0)), and the mean Gunning-Fog index was also lower (15.1 (3.79,18.3) vs 20.7 (6.82,22.6)). The mean (SD,range) PCE score was 2.8 (0.34,1.17), compared to 5 (0,0) for the gold standard, and this was a statistically significant difference (t (21) = -29,p = .001). Conclusion: Participants used too many words in their PCE comments with reduced descriptive content that did not match the reading level of the gold standard. Areas for suggested improvement in practice include introduction of a comment-forming model with additional education. These findings provide an interesting addition to the growing PCE knowledge base. Implications for practice: Dedicated training prior to implementation and participation, to standardise comment structure, could improve the effectiveness of the PCE system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectRadiologyen_US
dc.titleAn analysis of the structure and brevity of preliminary clinical evaluations describing traumatic abnormalities on extremity x-ray imagesen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleRadiography
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorStevens, Barry
dc.contributor.departmentImagingen_US
dc.contributor.roleAllied Health Professionalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationWalsall Healthcare NHS Trusten_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record