• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    • Medicine
    • Oncology
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    • Medicine
    • Oncology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of West Midlands Evidence RepositoryCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutPolicies Privacy NoticeBlack Country Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS TrustDudley Group NHS Foundation TrustGeorge Eliot Hospital NHS TrustSandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustSouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustWalsall Healthcare NHS Trust

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Additional consensus recommendations for conducting complex innovative trials of oncology agents: a post-pandemic perspective.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Blagden, Sarah P
    Yu, Ly-Mee
    Ellis, Stephanie
    Hughes, Helen
    Shaaban, Abeer
    Fennelly-Barnwell, Jonathan
    Lythgoe, Mark P
    Cooper, Alison M
    Maignen, Francois M
    Buckland, Sean W
    Kearns, Pamela R
    Brown, Louise C
    Show allShow less
    Publication date
    2022-11-24
    Subject
    Pharmacology
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    n our 2020 consensus paper, we devised ten recommendations for conducting Complex Innovative Design (CID) trials to evaluate cancer drugs. Within weeks of its publication, the UK was hit by the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Large CID trials were prioritised to compare the efficacy of new and repurposed COVID-19 treatments and inform regulatory decisions. The unusual circumstances of the pandemic meant studies such as RECOVERY were opened almost immediately and recruited record numbers of participants. However, trial teams were required to make concessions and adaptations to these studies to ensure recruitment was rapid and broad. As these are relevant to cancer trials that enrol patients with similar risk factors, we have added three new recommendations to our original ten: employing pragmatism such as using focused information sheets and collection of only the most relevant data; minimising negative environmental impacts with paperless systems; and using direct-to-patient communication methods to improve uptake. These recommendations can be applied to all oncology CID trials to improve their inclusivity, uptake and efficiency. Above all, the success of CID studies during the COVID-19 pandemic underscores their efficacy as tools for rapid treatment evaluation.
    Citation
    Blagden SP, Yu LM, Ellis S, Hughes H, Shaaban A, Fennelly-Barnwell J, Lythgoe MP, Cooper AM, Maignen FM, Buckland SW, Kearns PR, Brown LC; Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC) CID trials working group. Additional consensus recommendations for conducting complex innovative trials of oncology agents: a post-pandemic perspective. Br J Cancer. 2023 Feb;128(3):474-477. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02051-7. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
    Type
    Article
    Handle
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1266
    Additional Links
    http://www.nature.com/bjc
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/334/
    DOI
    10.1038/s41416-022-02051-7
    PMID
    36434156
    Journal
    British Journal of Cancer
    Publisher
    Nature Publishing Group
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1038/s41416-022-02051-7
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Oncology

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.