Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelly, Michael E
dc.contributor.authorO'Sullivan, Niall J
dc.contributor.authorBolger, Jarlath C
dc.contributor.authorPolignano, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorYoussef, Haney
dc.contributor.authorRenehan, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorMalcomson, Lee
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Sue
dc.contributor.authorCecil, Tom
dc.contributor.authorMulsow, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Faheez
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-17T12:09:06Z
dc.date.available2023-07-17T12:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-08
dc.identifier.citationKelly ME, O'Sullivan NJ, Bolger JC, Polignano F, Youssef H, Renehan A, Malcomson L, Alves S, Cecil T, Mulsow J, Moran B, Mohamed F; UK & Ireland Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Registry. Age alone is not a barrier to efficacy of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: analysis of 1138 patients from the UK and Ireland Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Registry. Br J Cancer. 2023 Jan;128(1):42-47. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02037-5. Epub 2022 Nov 8.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1532-1827
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41416-022-02037-5
dc.identifier.pmid36347966
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1270
dc.description.abstractBackground: The management of colorectal peritoneal metastases continues to be a challenge but recent evidence suggests cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can improve survival. Uncertainty about the relationship between age and tumour biology makes patient selection challenging particularly when reported procedure related morbidity is high and impact on survival outcomes unknown. The UK and Ireland Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Registry was reviewed to assess the influence of age on efficacy of CRS and HIPEC. Methods: A review of outcomes from the UK and Ireland Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Registry was performed. Data from 2000 to 2021 were included from five centres in the UK and Ireland, and the cohort were sub-divided into three age groups; <45 years, 45-65 years and >65 years old. Primarily, we examined post-operative morbidity and survival outcomes across the three age groups. In addition, we examined the impact that the completeness of cytoreduction, nodal status, or adverse pathological features had on long-term survival. Results: During the study period, 1138 CPM patients underwent CRS HIPEC. 202 patients(17.8%) were <45 years, 549 patients(48.2%) aged 45-65 years and 387 patients(34%) >65 years. Overall, median length of surgery (CRS and HIPEC), median PCI score and rate of HIPEC administration was similar in all three groups, as was overall rates of major morbidity and/or mortality. Complete cytoreduction rates (CC0) were similar across the three cohorts; 77%, 80.6% and 81%, respectively. Median overall survival for all patients was 38 months following complete cytoreduction. Conclusion: Age did not appear to influence morbidity or long-term survival following CRS and HIPEC. When complete cytoreduction is achieved survival outcomes are good. The addition of HIPEC can be performed safely and may reduce local recurrence within the peritoneum.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.nature.com/bjcen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/334/en_US
dc.rights© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
dc.subjectOncology. Pathology.en_US
dc.titleAge alone is not a barrier to efficacy of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: analysis of 1138 patients from the UK and Ireland Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Registry.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleBritish Journal of Cancer
dc.source.volume128
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage42
dc.source.endpage47
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorYoussef, Haney
dc.contributor.departmentSurgeryen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record