Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study.
Author
Giani, Alessandrovan Ramshorst, Tess
Mazzola, Michele
Bassi, Claudio
Esposito, Alessandro
de Pastena, Matteo
Edwin, Bjørn
Sahakyan, Mushegh
Kleive, Dyre
Jah, Asif
van Laarhoven, Stijn
Boggi, Ugo
Kauffman, Emanuele Federico
Casadei, Riccardo
Ricci, Claudio
Dokmak, Safi
Ftériche, Fadhel Samir
White, Steven A
Kamarajah, Sivesh K
Butturini, Giovanni
Frigerio, Isabella
Zerbi, Alessandro
Capretti, Giovanni
Pando, Elizabeth
Sutcliffe, Robert P
Marudanayagam, Ravi
Fusai, Giuseppe Kito
Fabre, Jean Michel
Björnsson, Bergthor
Timmermann, Lea
Soonawalla, Zahir
Burdio, Fernando
Keck, Tobias
Hackert, Thilo
Groot Koerkamp, Bas
D'Hondt, Mathieu
Coratti, Andrea
Pessaux, Patrick
Pietrabissa, Andrea
Al-Sarireh, Bilal
Marino, Marco V
Molenaar, Quintus
Yip, Vincent
Besselink, Marc
Ferrari, Giovanni
Hilal, Mohammad Abu
Publication date
2022-07-14
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS). Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk. Results: A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87). Conclusion: The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.Citation
Br J Surg. 2022 Oct 14;109(11):1124-1130. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac204Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://academic.oup.com/bjsPMID
35834788Journal
British Journal of SurgeryPublisher
Oxford University Pressae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/bjs/znac204