Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartins, S M
dc.contributor.authorDickens, A P
dc.contributor.authorSalibe-Filho, W
dc.contributor.authorAlbuquerque Neto, A A
dc.contributor.authorAdab, P
dc.contributor.authorEnocson, A
dc.contributor.authorCooper, B G
dc.contributor.authorSousa, L V A
dc.contributor.authorSitch, A J
dc.contributor.authorJowett, S
dc.contributor.authorAdams, R
dc.contributor.authorCheng, K K
dc.contributor.authorChi, C
dc.contributor.authorCorreia-de-Sousa, J
dc.contributor.authorFarley, A
dc.contributor.authorGale, N
dc.contributor.authorJolly, K
dc.contributor.authorMaglakelidze, M
dc.contributor.authorMaghlakelidze, T
dc.contributor.authorStavrikj, K
dc.contributor.authorTurner, A M
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, S
dc.contributor.authorJordan, R E
dc.contributor.authorStelmach, R
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-27T12:32:25Z
dc.date.available2023-07-27T12:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-13
dc.identifier.citationMartins SM, Dickens AP, Salibe-Filho W, Albuquerque Neto AA, Adab P, Enocson A, Cooper BG, Sousa LVA, Sitch AJ, Jowett S, Adams R, Cheng KK, Chi C, Correia-de-Sousa J, Farley A, Gale N, Jolly K, Maglakelidze M, Maghlakelidze T, Stavrikj K, Turner AM, Williams S, Jordan RE, Stelmach R. Accuracy and economic evaluation of screening tests for undiagnosed COPD among hypertensive individuals in Brazil. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022 Dec 13;32(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00303-wen_US
dc.identifier.eissn2055-1010
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41533-022-00303-w
dc.identifier.pmid36513683
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1374
dc.description.abstractIn Brazil, prevalence of diagnosed COPD among adults aged 40 years and over is 16% although over 70% of cases remain undiagnosed. Hypertension is common and well-recorded in primary care, and frequently co-exists with COPD because of common causes such as tobacco smoking, therefore we conducted a cross-sectional screening test accuracy study in nine Basic Health Units in Brazil, among hypertensive patients aged ≥40 years to identify the optimum screening test/combinations to detect undiagnosed COPD. We compared six index tests (four screening questionnaires, microspirometer and peak flow) against the reference test defined as those below the lower limit of normal (LLN-GLI) on quality diagnostic spirometry, with confirmed COPD at clinical review. Of 1162 participants, 6.8% (n = 79) had clinically confirmed COPD. Peak flow had a higher specificity but lower sensitivity than microspirometry (sensitivity 44.3% [95% CI 33.1, 55.9], specificity 95.5% [95% CI 94.1, 96.6]). SBQ performed well compared to the other questionnaires (sensitivity 75.9% [95% CI 65.0, 84.9], specificity 59.2% [95% CI 56.2, 62.1]). A strategy requiring both SBQ and peak flow to be positive yielded sensitivity of 39.2% (95% CI 28.4, 50.9) and specificity of 97.0% (95% CI 95.7, 97.9). The use of simple screening tests was feasible within the Brazilian primary care setting. The combination of SBQ and peak flow appeared most efficient, when considering performance of the test, cost and ease of use (costing £1690 (5554 R$) with 26.7 cases detected per 1,000 patients). However, the choice of screening tests depends on the clinical setting and availability of resources.ISRCTN registration number: 11377960.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.nature.com/npjpcrm/en_US
dc.rights© 2022. The Author(s).
dc.subjectPractice of medicineen_US
dc.titleAccuracy and economic evaluation of screening tests for undiagnosed COPD among hypertensive individuals in Brazil.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitlenpj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
dc.source.volume32
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage55
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorCooper, Brendan
dc.contributor.departmentOutpatientsen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record