Show simple item record

Diabetic maculopathy: multicolour and SD-OCT versus fundus photography.

dc.contributor.authorKousha, Obaid
dc.contributor.authorDelle Fave, Martina Maria
dc.contributor.authorCozzi, Mariano
dc.contributor.authorCarini, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorPagliarini, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T11:20:36Z
dc.date.available2023-07-31T11:20:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-19
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open Ophthalmol . 2021 Feb 19;6(1):e000514en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2397-3269
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000514
dc.identifier.pmid33681471
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1493
dc.description.abstractThe English Diabetic Eye Screening (DES) programme recommends patients with M1 diabetic maculopathy to be referred to hospital eye services. DES uses flash fundus photography as the reference standard for maculopathy grading. We compared multicolour versus non-stereoscopic fundus photography at identifying M1 maculopathy, with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) identifying macular thickening.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898856/en_US
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
dc.subjectOphthalmologyen_US
dc.titleDiabetic maculopathy: multicolour and SD-OCT versus fundus photography.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ Open Ophthalmology
dc.source.volume6
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpagee000514
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorPagliarini, Sergio
dc.contributor.departmentSurgical Servicesen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record