Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy.
Author
Sharma, HarishLiu, Boyang
Yuan, Mengshi
Shakeel, Iqra
Morley-Smith, Andrew
Hatch, Alice
Bradley, Joseph
Chue, Colin
Myerson, Saul G
Steeds, Richard Paul
Lim, Sern
Publication date
2023-06-10Subject
Cardiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts the likelihood of residual MR. Methods: This is a retrospective single-centre study of 155 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation from January 2011 to March 2020. Exclusion criteria were no MR pre-LVAD (n=8), inaccessible echocardiography (n=9), duplicate records (n=10) and concomitant mitral valve repair (n=1). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA V.16 and SPSS V.24. Results: Carpentier IIIb MR aetiology was associated with more severe MR pre-LVAD (severe 18/27 (67%) vs non-severe 32/91 (35%), p=0.004) and a higher likelihood of residual MR (8/11 (72%) vs 30/74 (41%), p=0.045). Of 95 patients with significant MR pre-LVAD, 15 (16%) had persistent significant MR, which was associated with higher mortality (p=0.006), post-LVAD right ventricle (RV) dilatation (10/15 (67%) vs 28/80 (35%), p=0.022) and RV dysfunction (14/15 (93%) vs 35/80 (44%), p<0.001). Aside from ischaemic aetiology, other pre-LVAD parameters that were associated with significant residual MR included left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (6.9 cm (5.7-7.2) vs 5.9 cm (5.5-6.5), p=0.043), left atrial volume index (LAVi) (78 mL/m2 (56-88) vs 57 mL/m2 (47-77), p=0.021), posterior leaflet displacement (2.5 cm (2.3-2.9) vs 2.3 cm (1.9-2.7), p=0.042) and basal right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) (5.1±0.8 cm vs 4.5±0.8 cm, p=0.010). Conclusion: LVAD therapy improves MR and tricuspid regurgitation severity in the majority, but 14% have persistent significant residual MR, associated with right ventricular dysfunction and higher long-term mortality. This may be predicted pre-LVAD by greater LVESD, RVEDD and LAVi and by ischaemic aetiology.Citation
Sharma H, Liu B, Yuan M, Shakeel I, Morley-Smith A, Hatch A, Bradley J, Chue C, Myerson SG, Steeds RP, Lim S. Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy. Open Heart. 2023 Jun;10(1):e002240. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240. PMID: 37316326; PMCID: PMC10277521.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://openheart.bmj.com/PMID
37316326Journal
Open HeartPublisher
BMJ Publishing Groupae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240