Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSharma, Harish
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Boyang
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Mengshi
dc.contributor.authorShakeel, Iqra
dc.contributor.authorMorley-Smith, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorHatch, Alice
dc.contributor.authorBradley, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorChue, Colin
dc.contributor.authorMyerson, Saul G
dc.contributor.authorSteeds, Richard Paul
dc.contributor.authorLim, Sern
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-02T11:24:15Z
dc.date.available2023-08-02T11:24:15Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-10
dc.identifier.citationSharma H, Liu B, Yuan M, Shakeel I, Morley-Smith A, Hatch A, Bradley J, Chue C, Myerson SG, Steeds RP, Lim S. Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy. Open Heart. 2023 Jun;10(1):e002240. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240. PMID: 37316326; PMCID: PMC10277521.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2053-3624
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240
dc.identifier.pmid37316326
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1556
dc.description.abstractBackground: Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts the likelihood of residual MR. Methods: This is a retrospective single-centre study of 155 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation from January 2011 to March 2020. Exclusion criteria were no MR pre-LVAD (n=8), inaccessible echocardiography (n=9), duplicate records (n=10) and concomitant mitral valve repair (n=1). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA V.16 and SPSS V.24. Results: Carpentier IIIb MR aetiology was associated with more severe MR pre-LVAD (severe 18/27 (67%) vs non-severe 32/91 (35%), p=0.004) and a higher likelihood of residual MR (8/11 (72%) vs 30/74 (41%), p=0.045). Of 95 patients with significant MR pre-LVAD, 15 (16%) had persistent significant MR, which was associated with higher mortality (p=0.006), post-LVAD right ventricle (RV) dilatation (10/15 (67%) vs 28/80 (35%), p=0.022) and RV dysfunction (14/15 (93%) vs 35/80 (44%), p<0.001). Aside from ischaemic aetiology, other pre-LVAD parameters that were associated with significant residual MR included left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (6.9 cm (5.7-7.2) vs 5.9 cm (5.5-6.5), p=0.043), left atrial volume index (LAVi) (78 mL/m2 (56-88) vs 57 mL/m2 (47-77), p=0.021), posterior leaflet displacement (2.5 cm (2.3-2.9) vs 2.3 cm (1.9-2.7), p=0.042) and basal right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) (5.1±0.8 cm vs 4.5±0.8 cm, p=0.010). Conclusion: LVAD therapy improves MR and tricuspid regurgitation severity in the majority, but 14% have persistent significant residual MR, associated with right ventricular dysfunction and higher long-term mortality. This may be predicted pre-LVAD by greater LVESD, RVEDD and LAVi and by ischaemic aetiology.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://openheart.bmj.com/en_US
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
dc.subjectCardiologyen_US
dc.titlePredictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleOpen Heart
dc.source.volume10
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorSharma, Harish
dc.contributor.trustauthorLiu, Boyang
dc.contributor.trustauthorYuan, Mengshi
dc.contributor.trustauthorMorley-Smith, Andrew
dc.contributor.trustauthorHatch, Alice
dc.contributor.trustauthorBradley, Joseph
dc.contributor.trustauthorChue, Colin
dc.contributor.trustauthorSteeds, Richard Paul
dc.contributor.trustauthorLim, Sern
dc.contributor.departmentCardiologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record