Exploring the views of patients' and their family about patient-initiated follow-up in head and neck cancer: A mixed methods study.
dc.contributor.author | Lorenc, Ava | |
dc.contributor.author | Greaves, Colin | |
dc.contributor.author | Duda, Joan | |
dc.contributor.author | Brett, Jo | |
dc.contributor.author | Matheson, Lauren | |
dc.contributor.author | Fulton-Lieuw, Tessa | |
dc.contributor.author | Secher, Denis | |
dc.contributor.author | Rhodes, Pat | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozakinci, Gozde | |
dc.contributor.author | Nankivell, Paul | |
dc.contributor.author | Mehanna, Hisham | |
dc.contributor.author | Jepson, Marcus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-04T13:07:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-04T13:07:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lorenc A, Greaves C, Duda J, Brett J, Matheson L, Fulton-Lieuw T, Secher D, Rhodes P, Ozakinci G, Nankivell P, Mehanna H, Jepson M; PETNECK2 Research Team. Exploring the views of patients' and their family about patient-initiated follow-up in head and neck cancer: A mixed methods study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13641. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13641. Epub 2022 Jul 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0961-5423 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1365-2354 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ecc.13641 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35789510 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1596 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The objective of this work was to explore head and neck cancer (HNC) patients' and their family members' views on acceptability and feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU), including concerns and anticipated benefits. Methods: Patients were recruited from UK HNC clinics, support groups and advocacy groups. They completed a survey (n = 144) and/or qualitative interview (n = 30), three with a family member. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, quantitative data using descriptive statistics. Results: Preference for follow-up care in HNC was complex and individual. Many patients thought PIFU could beneficially reallocate health care resources and encourage self-management. Patients' main concerns with PIFU were losing the reassurance of regular clinic appointments and addressing mental well-being needs within PIFU, possibly using peer support. Patients were concerned about their ability to detect recurrence due to lack of expertise and information. They emphasised the importance of a reliable, direct and easy urgent appointment service and of feeling supported and heard by clinicians. Patients believed family and friends need support. Conclusion: PIFU may be feasible and acceptable for certain HNC patients, providing it addresses support for mental well-being, provides quick, reliable and direct clinician access and information on "red flag" symptoms, and ensures patients and their caregivers feel supported. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.relation.url | https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ejcc/ | en_US |
dc.relation.url | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2354 | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | |
dc.subject | Diseases & disorders of systemic, metabolic or environmental origin | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject | Orthopaedics | en_US |
dc.title | Exploring the views of patients' and their family about patient-initiated follow-up in head and neck cancer: A mixed methods study. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | European Journal of Cancer Care | |
dc.source.volume | 31 | |
dc.source.issue | 6 | |
dc.source.beginpage | e13641 | |
dc.source.endpage | ||
dc.source.country | England | |
rioxxterms.version | NA | en_US |
dc.contributor.trustauthor | Nankivell, Paul | |
dc.contributor.trustauthor | Mehanna, Hisham | |
dc.contributor.department | ENT | en_US |
dc.contributor.role | Medical and Dental | en_US |
oa.grant.openaccess | na | en_US |