Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLorenc, Ava
dc.contributor.authorGreaves, Colin
dc.contributor.authorDuda, Joan
dc.contributor.authorBrett, Jo
dc.contributor.authorMatheson, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorFulton-Lieuw, Tessa
dc.contributor.authorSecher, Denis
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Pat
dc.contributor.authorOzakinci, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorNankivell, Paul
dc.contributor.authorMehanna, Hisham
dc.contributor.authorJepson, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-04T13:07:15Z
dc.date.available2023-08-04T13:07:15Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-04
dc.identifier.citationLorenc A, Greaves C, Duda J, Brett J, Matheson L, Fulton-Lieuw T, Secher D, Rhodes P, Ozakinci G, Nankivell P, Mehanna H, Jepson M; PETNECK2 Research Team. Exploring the views of patients' and their family about patient-initiated follow-up in head and neck cancer: A mixed methods study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13641. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13641. Epub 2022 Jul 4en_US
dc.identifier.issn0961-5423
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2354
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ecc.13641
dc.identifier.pmid35789510
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1596
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this work was to explore head and neck cancer (HNC) patients' and their family members' views on acceptability and feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU), including concerns and anticipated benefits. Methods: Patients were recruited from UK HNC clinics, support groups and advocacy groups. They completed a survey (n = 144) and/or qualitative interview (n = 30), three with a family member. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, quantitative data using descriptive statistics. Results: Preference for follow-up care in HNC was complex and individual. Many patients thought PIFU could beneficially reallocate health care resources and encourage self-management. Patients' main concerns with PIFU were losing the reassurance of regular clinic appointments and addressing mental well-being needs within PIFU, possibly using peer support. Patients were concerned about their ability to detect recurrence due to lack of expertise and information. They emphasised the importance of a reliable, direct and easy urgent appointment service and of feeling supported and heard by clinicians. Patients believed family and friends need support. Conclusion: PIFU may be feasible and acceptable for certain HNC patients, providing it addresses support for mental well-being, provides quick, reliable and direct clinician access and information on "red flag" symptoms, and ensures patients and their caregivers feel supported.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.hindawi.com/journals/ejcc/en_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2354en_US
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.subjectDiseases & disorders of systemic, metabolic or environmental originen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectOrthopaedicsen_US
dc.titleExploring the views of patients' and their family about patient-initiated follow-up in head and neck cancer: A mixed methods study.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleEuropean Journal of Cancer Care
dc.source.volume31
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.beginpagee13641
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorNankivell, Paul
dc.contributor.trustauthorMehanna, Hisham
dc.contributor.departmentENTen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record