Considerations for patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.
Author
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan LeeMcMullan, Christel
Hughes, Sarah E
Turner, Grace M
Subramanian, Anuradhaa
Hotham, Richard
Davies, Elin Haf
Frost, Chris
Alder, Yvonne
Agyen, Lisa
Buckland, Lewis
Camaradou, Jennifer
Chong, Amy
Jeyes, Felicity
Kumar, Sumita
Matthews, Karen L
Moore, Patricia
Ormerod, Jane
Price, Gary
Saint-Cricq, Michael
Stanton, David
Walker, Anita
Haroon, Shamil
Denniston, Alastair K
Calvert, Melanie J
Publication date
2023-07-20
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) can provide valuable insights into the experiences of those living with and affected by a disease or health condition. Inclusive collaboration between patients, the public and researchers can lead to productive relationships, ensuring that health research addresses patient needs. Guidelines are available to support effective PPIE; however, evaluation of the impact of PPIE strategies in health research is limited. In this Review, we evaluate the impact of PPIE in the ‘Therapies for Long COVID in non-hospitalised individuals’ (TLC) Study, using a combination of group discussions and interviews with patient partners and researchers. We identify areas of good practice and reflect on areas for improvement. Using these insights and the results of a survey, we synthesize two checklists of considerations for PPIE, and we propose that research teams use these checklists to optimize the impact of PPIE for both patients and researchers in future studies.Citation
Aiyegbusi OL, McMullan C, Hughes SE, Turner GM, Subramanian A, Hotham R, Davies EH, Frost C, Alder Y, Agyen L, Buckland L, Camaradou J, Chong A, Jeyes F, Kumar S, Matthews KL, Moore P, Ormerod J, Price G, Saint-Cricq M, Stanton D, Walker A, Haroon S, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ; TLC Study Group. Considerations for patient and public involvement and engagement in health research. Nat Med. 2023 Jul 20. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02445-x. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37474660.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02445-xPMID
37474660Journal
Nature MedicinePublisher
Nature Researchae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41591-023-02445-x
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS TrustHeer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; CEBIS; CEBIS (University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, 2023-11)Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS Trust
-
Enhancing wellbeing in medical practice: Exploring interventions and effectiveness for improving the work lives of resident (junior) doctors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Hirayama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Thoburn, Maxwell; Hancox, Jennifer; Muzaffar, Jameel; Hiriyama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Hancox, Jennifer; et al. (Elsevier Ltd, 2024-10-16)Introduction: Globally, resident doctors face challenges like long work hours, critical decision-making stress, and exposure to death and distress, prompting concern for their wellbeing. This study addresses the need for interventions to improve their working conditions, vital for enhancing quality of life, patient care and retaining a skilled workforce. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review until 3 January 2024 explored interventions for resident Ddoctors pre- and post-COVID-19. It evaluated intervention effectiveness, metrics and feasibility, excluding studies with high bias risk. Results: The review identified diverse interventions, from mentoring to wellness resources, showing significant improvements in job satisfaction, mental health and professional growth among resident doctors. Due to methodological variations, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Conclusion: Effective interventions addressing resident doctors' challenges can notably enhance their wellbeing and job satisfaction. Scaling such interventions is vital for fostering supportive work environments, sustaining the healthcare workforce and improving patient care quality.
-
Faculty development: clinical dermatology for medical secretaries and administrative staffAgrawal, Rishi; Browne, Rachel; Baldwin, Nicola; Scott, H.; Tso, Simon; Agrawal, R.; Browne, R.; Baldwin, N.; Scott, H.; Tso, S.; et al. (Oxford University Press, 2020-06)A study investigating the potential benefits of specialty-specific clinical inductions for medical secretaries and administrative staff.