Show simple item record

dc.relation.isnodouble5030*
dc.relation.isnodouble5026*
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Sarah C
dc.contributor.authorMeeralakshmi, Prajna
dc.contributor.authorFliotsos, Michael J
dc.contributor.authorJustin, Grant A
dc.contributor.authorYonekawa, Yoshihiro
dc.contributor.authorChen, Ariel
dc.contributor.authorHoskin, Annette K
dc.contributor.authorBlanch, Richard J
dc.contributor.authorCavuoto, Kara M
dc.contributor.authorLow, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorLi, Ximin
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorLiu, T Y Alvin
dc.contributor.authorShah, Ankoor S
dc.contributor.authorAuran, James D
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Rupesh
dc.contributor.authorWoreta, Fasika A
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-17T14:37:06Z
dc.date.available2023-08-17T14:37:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-26
dc.identifier.citationMiller SC, Meeralakshmi P, Fliotsos MJ, Justin GA, Yonekawa Y, Chen A, Hoskin AK, Blanch RJ, Cavuoto KM, Low R, Li X, Gardiner M, Liu TYA, Shah AS, Auran JD, Agrawal R, Woreta FA; International Globe and Adnexal Trauma Epidemiology Study (IGATES). Global Current Practice Patterns for the Management of Hyphema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 26;16:3135-3144. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S372273en_US
dc.identifier.issn1177-5467
dc.identifier.issn1177-5467
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/OPTH.S372273
dc.identifier.pmid36187914
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1740
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Hyphema is a sequela of ocular trauma and can be associated with significant morbidity. Management of this condition is variable and can depend on individual institutional guidelines. We aimed to summarize current practices in hyphema management across ophthalmological institutions worldwide. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted across North America, Asia, South America, Africa, Europe, and Australia from August 2020 to January 2021. The survey assessed the existing practices in the management of hyphema at each institution. Results: For layered hyphema, topical steroids were routinely administered by 34 (of 36 respondents, 94.4%) institutions, of which prednisolone was the preferred choice (n = 32, 88.9%). Topical cycloplegics were used at 34 (94.4%) institutions. No institution reported routine use of antifibrinolytics. Head elevation was the most deployed procedure to promote hyphema reabsorption (n = 31, 86.3%), followed by partial bed rest (n = 21, 58.3%). The majority of institutions (n = 25, 69.4%) did not routinely pursue admission for hyphema patients, although 75.0% of institutions (n = 27) scheduled follow-up visits within 48 hours of presentation. Additionally, few institutions performed routine sickle cell trait testing for patients presenting with hyphema (n = 6, 16.7%). The decision to perform anterior chamber washout varied and was often based on intraocular pressure and the speed of hyphema resolution. Conclusion: Unanimity of international institutions on hyphema management is lacking. As it stands, many current interventions have unconvincing evidence supporting their use. Evidence-based guidelines would be beneficial in guiding decision-making on hyphema management. Additionally, areas of consensus can be used as foundations for future standard of care investigations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.dovepress.com/articles.php?journal_id=9en_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/909/en_US
dc.rights© 2022 Miller et al.
dc.subjectOphthalmologyen_US
dc.titleGlobal current practice patterns for the management of hyphema.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleClinical Ophthalmology
dc.source.volume16
dc.source.beginpage3135
dc.source.endpage3144
dc.source.countryNew Zealand
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorBlanch, Richard J
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record