Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Laura, PompermaierJosé, Adorno
Nikki, Allorto
Khaled, Altarrah
Barret, Juan
Jeffery, Carter
Shobha, Chamania
Jack, Chong Si
Scott, Corlew
Nadia, Depetris
Moustafa, Elmasry
Liao, Junlin
Josef, Haik
Briana, Horwath
Sunil, Keswani
Tetsuro, Kiyozumi
Jorge, Leon-Villapalos
Gaoxing, Luo
Hajime, Matsumura
Ariel, Miranda-Altamirano
Naiem, Moiemen
Kiran, Nakarmi
Nawar, Ahmed
Faustin, Ntirenganya
Anthony, Olekwu
Tom, Potokar
Liang, Qiao
Man, Rai Shankar
Ingrid, Steinvall
Ahmed, Tanveer
Vana Molina, Philipe Luiz
Shelley, Wall
Mark, Fisher
Publication date
2021-11-17Subject
Surgery
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Worldwide, different strategies have been chosen to face the COVID-19-patient surge, often affecting access to health care for other patients. This observational study aimed to investigate whether the standard of burn care changed globally during the pandemic, and whether country´s income, geographical location, COVID-19-transmission pattern, and levels of specialization of the burn units affected reallocation of resources and access to burn care. Methods: The Burn Care Survey is a questionnaire developed to collect information on the capacity to provide burn care by burn units around the world, before and during the pandemic. The survey was distributed between September and October 2020. McNemar`s test analyzed differences between services provided before and during the pandemic, χ2 or Fisher's exact test differences between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the independent effect of different factors on keeping the burn units open during the pandemic. Results: The survey was completed by 234 burn units in 43 countries. During the pandemic, presence of burn surgeons did not change (p = 0.06), while that of anesthetists and dedicated nursing staff was reduced (<0.01), and so did the capacity to manage patients in all age groups (p = 0.04). Use of telemedicine was implemented (p < 0.01), collaboration between burn centers was not. Burn units in LMICs and LICs were more likely to be closed, after adjustment for other factors. Conclusions: During the pandemic, most burn units were open, although availability of standard resources diminished worldwide. The use of telemedicine increased, suggesting the implementation of new strategies to manage burns. Low income was independently associated with reduced access to burn care.Citation
Laura P, José A, Nikki A, Khaled A, Barret J, Jeffery C, Shobha C, Jack CS, Scott C, Nadia D, Moustafa E, Liao J, Josef H, Briana H, Sunil K, Tetsuro K, Jorge LV, Gaoxing L, Hajime M, Ariel MA, Naiem M, Kiran N, Nawar A, Faustin N, Anthony O, Tom P, Liang Q, Man RS, Ingrid S, Ahmed T, Vana Molina PL, Shelley W, Mark F. Impact of COVID-19 on global burn care. Burns. 2022 Sep;48(6):1301-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 17Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/burnsPMID
34903416Journal
BurnsPublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.burns.2021.11.010