How do recovery-oriented interventions contribute to personal mental health recovery? A systematic review and logic model
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; R & I Department, Caludon Centre, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust, Clifford Bridge, Coventry CV2 2TE, UK; Black Country Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Delta House, Delta Point, Greets Green Road, West Bromwich, West Midlands B70 9PL, UK; Mental Health Research Unit (HSR), University of Sheffield, UK; Institute for Mental Health (IMH), University of Birmingham, UK; Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.Publication date
2020-01-07Subject
Mental health
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The emergent recovery paradigm prioritises adaption to serious mental illness and a move towards personally meaningful goals. In this review, we combine a theory driven logic model approach with systematic review techniques to forward understanding of how recovery-oriented interventions can help service users in their personal recovery journey. We identified 309 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Our logic model mapped out intervention typologies and their recovery outcomes, the mechanisms of action underpinning these links, and the contextual moderators of these mechanisms and outcomes. Interventions were associated with recovery outcomes (functional, existential and social) directly and through a sequence of processes, which were underpinned by four common mechanisms: 1) providing information and skills; 2) promoting a working alliance; 3) role modelling recovery; and 4) increasing choice. Moderators of these mechanisms were observed at the service user (e.g., motivation), mental health service (e.g., professional attitudes) and wider environmental (e.g., unemployment rates) level. Recovery-oriented interventions share common critical mechanisms, which can help propel service users towards recovery especially when delivered within pro-recovery and non-stigmatising contexts. Future studies should further examine ways to reduce (or remove) barriers preventing individuals with mental health problems from experiencing the same citizenship entitlements as everyone else.Citation
Winsper C, Crawford-Docherty A, Weich S, Fenton SJ, Singh SP. How do recovery-oriented interventions contribute to personal mental health recovery? A systematic review and logic model. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;76:101815. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101815. Epub 2020 Jan 7. PMID: 32062302.Type
ArticlePMID
32062302Journal
Clinical Psychology ReviewPublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101815
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.