Botulinum toxin in the management of myalgia in temporomandibular disorders: are all injections equal?
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
University of Birmingham; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustPublication date
2022-11-29
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Botulinum toxin (BTX) is becoming widely used as an adjunct to conservative management of myalgia-predominant temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) with reports of improved quality of life. There is, however, no consensus on the optimal dosage. Based on previous studies, dose regimens vary between clinicians, and we know of no standard dose protocol for the administration of BTX for the purpose of TMD management. A survey was sent to members of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) Temporomandibular Joint Sub-Specialty Interest Group (TMJ SSIG) and an international mailing list of high-volume TMJ surgeons (the TMJ Internetwork) to ascertain variations in dose regimens between different clinicians. The survey found that 41 respondents offered BTX to patients. The masseter muscle group was the most commonly injected site, and the majority of respondents (34/41) used Botox® (Allergan). Brands less commonly used included Dysport® (Ipsen), and Xeomin® (Merz Pharma). Botox® doses varied between 30 and 100 units, whilst Dysport® doses ranged from 50 - 300 units/muscle. The number of injection sites/muscle also varied. This survey demonstrates the wide variation in practice amongst clinicians with respect to BTX administration. To ensure optimal dose and response titration, further studies and evidence-based research are needed to standardise its use for the treatment of TMDs.Citation
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jan;61(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.11.279. Epub 2022 Nov 29.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02664356PMID
36522255Publisher
Churchill Livingstoneae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.11.279