Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSimons, G
dc.contributor.authorSchölin Bywall, K
dc.contributor.authorEnglbrecht, M
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, E C
dc.contributor.authorDiSantostefano, R L
dc.contributor.authorRadawski, C
dc.contributor.authorVeldwijk, J
dc.contributor.authorRaza, Karim
dc.contributor.authorFalahee, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T13:25:11Z
dc.date.available2023-08-29T13:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-30
dc.identifier.citationSimons, G., Schölin Bywall, K., Englbrecht, M., Johansson, E. C., DiSantostefano, R. L., Radawski, C., Veldwijk, J., Raza, K., & Falahee, M. (2022). Exploring preferences of at-risk individuals for preventive treatments for rheumatoid arthritis. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology, 1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2022.2116805en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1502-7732
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03009742.2022.2116805
dc.identifier.pmid36178461
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1973
dc.description.abstractObjective: Some immunomodulatory drugs have been shown to delay the onset of, or lower the risk of developing, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), if given to individuals at risk. Several trials are ongoing in this area; however, little evidence is currently available about the views of those at risk of RA regarding preventive treatment. Method: Three focus groups and three interviews explored factors that are relevant to first degree relatives (FDRs) of RA patients and members of the general public when considering taking preventive treatment for RA. The semi-structured qualitative interview prompts explored participant responses to hypothetical attributes of preventive RA medicines. Transcripts of focus group/interview proceedings were inductively coded and analysed using a framework approach. Results: Twenty-one individuals (five FDRs, 16 members of the general public) took part in the study. Ten broad themes were identified describing factors that participants felt would influence their decisions about whether to take preventive treatment if they were at increased risk of RA. These related either directly to features of the specific treatment or to other factors, including personal characteristics, attitude towards taking medication, and an individual's actual risk of developing RA. Conclusion: This research highlights the importance of non-treatment factors in the decision-making process around preventive treatments, and will inform recruitment to clinical trials as well as information to support shared decision making by those considering preventive treatment. Studies of treatment preferences in individuals with a confirmed high risk of RA would further inform clinical trial design.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Groupen_US
dc.subjectRheumatologyen_US
dc.titleExploring preferences of at-risk individuals for preventive treatments for rheumatoid arthritis.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorRaza, Karim
dc.contributor.departmentRheumatologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birmingham; Uppsala University; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trusten_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record