Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElhelaly, Amr M
dc.contributor.authorElnaggar, Ahmed K
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Magd El Din M
dc.contributor.authorAbdelfattah, Mahmoud H
dc.contributor.authorFarag, Amr H
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T11:44:54Z
dc.date.available2023-08-30T11:44:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-25
dc.identifier.citationElhelaly AM, Elnaggar AK, Mohamed MEDM, Abdelfattah MH, Farag AH. First trimester placental volume and vascular indices in pregestational diabetic compared to nondiabetic pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Aug;46(8):1326-1332en_US
dc.identifier.issn1341-8076
dc.identifier.eissn1447-0756
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jog.14271
dc.identifier.pmid32585732
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/1986
dc.description.abstractAim: Comparing placental volume (PV) and vascular indices in pregestational diabetic and nondiabetic pregnant women at 11 and 13 weeks gestation. Methods: A case-control study conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital in collaboration with Feto-maternal Unit for Ultrasound Assessment, Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Egypt. Ninety-two pregnant women divided into two groups: Group A included 46 women with pregestational diabetes mellitus and group B included 46 nondiabetic pregnant women as control. All participants had PV, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) calculated using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography and 3D power Doppler at 11 and 13 weeks of pregnancy. Results: At 11 weeks, the mean VI, FI and VFI in diabetic group (17.70 ± 12.62, 40.72 ± 11.03 and 7.77 ± 6.37, respectively) were insignificantly higher than in nondiabetic group (12.14 ± 12.62, 34.59 ± 9.66 and 6.52 ± 14.20, respectively) while mean PV in diabetic group (26.90 ± 14.74) was insignificantly lower than in nondiabetic group (27.53 ± 17.46). Also at 13 weeks, the results were not different as the mean VI, FI and VFI in diabetic group (16.51 ± 9.81, 42.52 ± 7.47 and 8.12 ± 7.55, respectively) were insignificantly higher than in nondiabetic group (16.37 ± 14.17, 40.29 ± 17.52 and 7.08 ± 4.35, respectively), and mean PV in diabetic group (52.04 ± 17.95) was insignificantly lower than in nondiabetic group (54.46 ± 17.85). There was strong positive correlation between HbA1C level and VFI measured at 13 weeks gestation. Conclusions: Placental indices in early pregnancy do not seem to be useful markers to anticipate placental pathology in pregestational diabetes, however there might be a role for HbA1C level measurement to anticipate such complications.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectDiabetesen_US
dc.subjectGynaecologyen_US
dc.subjectObstetrics. Midwiferyen_US
dc.titleFirst trimester placental volume and vascular indices in pregestational diabetic compared to nondiabetic pregnant women.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorFarag, Amr H
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationAin Shams University Maternity Hospital; Walsall Healthcare NHS Trusten_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record