Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChandarana, M.
dc.contributor.authorHarries, Simon
dc.contributor.authorNational Braxon Audit Study Group
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-01T13:44:17Z
dc.date.available2023-09-01T13:44:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.identifier.citationChandarana M, Harries S; National Braxon Audit Study Group. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. BJS Open. 2020 Feb;4(1):71-77. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50236. Epub 2019 Dec 19.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2474-9842
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bjs5.50236
dc.identifier.pmid32011819
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/2048
dc.description.abstractBackground: Single-stage reconstruction is used widely after mastectomy. Prepectoral implant placement is a relatively new technique. This multicentre audit examined surgical outcomes following prepectoral reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix (ADM). Methods: All patients who had a mastectomy with prepectoral breast reconstruction and ADM in the participating centres between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. Demographic and treatment details, and short- and long-term operative outcomes were recorded. Factors affecting complications and implant loss were analysed: age, BMI, smoking status, diabetes, vascular disease, laterality of surgery, previous ipsilateral breast surgery or radiotherapy, indication for surgery (invasive versus in situ carcinoma, or risk reduction), type of mastectomy, axillary clearance, breast volume, implant volume, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: A total of 406 reconstructions were performed across 18 centres. Median follow-up was 9·65 months. Median hospital stay was 1 day. The 90-day unplanned readmission rate was 15·7 per cent, and the return-to-theatre rate 16·7 per cent. Some 15·3 per cent of patients had a major complication, with a 90-day implant loss rate of 4·9 per cent. A further six patients had delayed implant loss. In multivariable analysis, no factor was significantly associated with complications or implant loss. Conclusion: Prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM has satisfactory surgical outcomes. The duration of follow-up needs to be extended to examine outcomes in patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc6996627/en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectPlastic surgeryen_US
dc.titleMulticentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrixen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleBJS Open
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-02-03
refterms.dateFCD2025-02-28T14:58:08Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
dc.contributor.trustauthorHarries, Simon
dc.contributor.departmentGeneral Surgeryen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationForth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert; South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trusten_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US
dc.identifier.FullTexthttps://westmid.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/20.500.14200/2048/Multicentre%20study%20of%20prepectoral%20breast%20reconstruction%20using%20acellular%20dermal%20matrix.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Multicentre study of prepectoral ...
Size:
611.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International