Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRiad, Hisham M
dc.contributor.authorBoulton, Adam J
dc.contributor.authorSlowther, Anne-Marie
dc.contributor.authorBassford, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-11T13:00:10Z
dc.date.available2023-09-11T13:00:10Z
dc.date.issued02/06/2022
dc.identifier.citationRiad HM, Boulton AJ, Slowther AM, Bassford C. Investigating the impact of brief training in decision-making on treatment escalation to intensive care using objective structured clinical examination-style scenarios. J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Feb;24(1):53-61. doi: 10.1177/17511437221105979. Epub 2022 Jun 2en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-1437
dc.identifier.issn1751-1437
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/17511437221105979
dc.identifier.pmid36874284
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/2133
dc.description.abstractBackground: The decision to admit patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) is complex. Structuring the decision-making process may be beneficial to patients and decision-makers alike. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and impact of a brief training intervention on ICU treatment escalation decisions using the Warwick model- a structured decision-making framework for treatment escalation decisions. Methods: Treatment escalation decisions were assessed using Objective Structured Clinical Examination-style scenarios. Participants were ICU and anaesthetic registrars with experience of making ICU admission decisions. Participants completed one scenario, followed by training with the decision-making framework and subsequently a second scenario. Decision-making data was collected using checklists, note entries and post-scenario questionnaires. Results: Twelve participants were enrolled. Brief decision-making training was successfully delivered during the normal ICU working day. Following training participants demonstrated greater evidence of balancing the burdens and benefits of treatment escalation. On visual analogue scales of 0-10, participants felt better trained to make treatment escalation decisions (4.9 vs 6.8, p = 0.017) and felt their decision-making was more structured (4.7 vs 8.1, p = 0.017).Overall, participants provided positive feedback and reported feeling more prepared for the task of making treatment escalation decisions. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a brief training intervention is a feasible way to improve the decision-making process by improving decision-making structure, reasoning and documentation. Training was implemented successfully, acceptable to participants and participants were able to apply their learning. Further studies of regional and national cohorts are needed to determine if training benefit is sustained and generalisable.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/home/incen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/3253/en_US
dc.rights© The Intensive Care Society 2022.
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectNeurologyen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the impact of brief training in decision-making on treatment escalation to intensive care using objective structured clinical examination-style scenarios.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the Intensive Care Society
dc.source.volume24
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage53
dc.source.endpage61
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorRiad, Hisham M
dc.contributor.trustauthorBassford, Christopher
dc.contributor.trustauthorSlowther, Anne-Marie
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record