Road map for clinicians to develop and evaluate AI predictive models to inform clinical decision-making.
Author
Hassan, NehalSlight, Robert
Morgan, Graham
Bates, David W
Gallier, Suzy
Sapey, Elizabeth
Slight, Sarah
Publication date
2023-08-30Subject
Public health. Health statistics. Occupational health. Health educationHealth services. Management
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Predictive models have been used in clinical care for decades. They can determine the risk of a patient developing a particular condition or complication and inform the shared decision-making process. Developing artificial intelligence (AI) predictive models for use in clinical practice is challenging; even if they have good predictive performance, this does not guarantee that they will be used or enhance decision-making. We describe nine stages of developing and evaluating a predictive AI model, recognising the challenges that clinicians might face at each stage and providing practical tips to help manage them. Findings: The nine stages included clarifying the clinical question or outcome(s) of interest (output), identifying appropriate predictors (features selection), choosing relevant datasets, developing the AI predictive model, validating and testing the developed model, presenting and interpreting the model prediction(s), licensing and maintaining the AI predictive model and evaluating the impact of the AI predictive model. The introduction of an AI prediction model into clinical practice usually consists of multiple interacting components, including the accuracy of the model predictions, physician and patient understanding and use of these probabilities, expected effectiveness of subsequent actions or interventions and adherence to these. Much of the difference in whether benefits are realised relates to whether the predictions are given to clinicians in a timely way that enables them to take an appropriate action. Conclusion: The downstream effects on processes and outcomes of AI prediction models vary widely, and it is essential to evaluate the use in clinical practice using an appropriate study design. Keywords: artificial intelligence; decision support systems, clinical; preventive medicine.Citation
Hassan N, Slight R, Morgan G, Bates DW, Gallier S, Sapey E, Slight S. Road map for clinicians to develop and evaluate AI predictive models to inform clinical decision-making. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Aug;30(1):e100784. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100784. PMID: 37558245; PMCID: PMC10414079.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://doaj.org/article/b429ec8dff8f465cbdcb873a6ce1e804PMID
37558245Journal
BMJ Health & Care InformaticsPublisher
BMJ Publishing Groupae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100784
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS TrustHeer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; CEBIS; CEBIS (University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, 2023-11)Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS Trust
-
Enhancing wellbeing in medical practice: Exploring interventions and effectiveness for improving the work lives of resident (junior) doctors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Hirayama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Thoburn, Maxwell; Hancox, Jennifer; Muzaffar, Jameel; Hiriyama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Hancox, Jennifer; et al. (Elsevier Ltd, 2024-10-16)Introduction: Globally, resident doctors face challenges like long work hours, critical decision-making stress, and exposure to death and distress, prompting concern for their wellbeing. This study addresses the need for interventions to improve their working conditions, vital for enhancing quality of life, patient care and retaining a skilled workforce. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review until 3 January 2024 explored interventions for resident Ddoctors pre- and post-COVID-19. It evaluated intervention effectiveness, metrics and feasibility, excluding studies with high bias risk. Results: The review identified diverse interventions, from mentoring to wellness resources, showing significant improvements in job satisfaction, mental health and professional growth among resident doctors. Due to methodological variations, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Conclusion: Effective interventions addressing resident doctors' challenges can notably enhance their wellbeing and job satisfaction. Scaling such interventions is vital for fostering supportive work environments, sustaining the healthcare workforce and improving patient care quality.
-
Faculty development: clinical dermatology for medical secretaries and administrative staffAgrawal, Rishi; Browne, Rachel; Baldwin, Nicola; Scott, H.; Tso, Simon; Agrawal, R.; Browne, R.; Baldwin, N.; Scott, H.; Tso, S.; et al. (Oxford University Press, 2020-06)A study investigating the potential benefits of specialty-specific clinical inductions for medical secretaries and administrative staff.