Cost-effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate intensity steady-state (MISS) training in UK cardiac rehabilitation.

Albustami, M; Hartfiel, N; Charles, J M; Powell, R; Begg, B; Birkett, S T; Nichols, S; Ennis, S; Hee, S W; Banerjee, P; Ingle, L; Shave, R; Edwards, R T; McGregor, Gordon

Name:

Publisher version

Author

Albustami, M
Hartfiel, N
Charles, J M
Powell, R
Begg, B
Birkett, S T
Nichols, S
Ennis, S
Hee, S W
Banerjee, P

Show all

Publication date

2023-09-18

Subject

Cardiology
Physiotherapy

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) compared to moderate intensity steady-state (MISS) training in people with coronary artery disease (CAD) attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

Citation

Albustami M, Hartfiel N, Charles JM, Powell R, Begg B, Birkett ST, Nichols S, Ennis S, Hee SW, Banerjee P, Ingle L, Shave R, McGregor G, Edwards RT. Cost-effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs Moderate Intensity Steady-State (MISS) Training in UK Cardiac Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep 18:S0003-9993(23)00529-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.005. Epub ahead of print.

Type

Article