Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHalle-Smith, J M
dc.contributor.authorBage, T
dc.contributor.authorKamarajah, S K
dc.contributor.authorSiddaiah-Subramanya, M
dc.contributor.authorPande, R
dc.contributor.authorWhiting, J L
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, E A
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T10:47:33Z
dc.date.available2023-09-28T10:47:33Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-29
dc.identifier.citationHalle-Smith JM, Bage T, Kamarajah SK, Siddaiah-Subramanya M, Pande R, Whiting JL, Griffiths EA. A preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Apr;106(4):369-376. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0140. Epub 2023 Aug 29.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0035-8843
dc.identifier.eissn1478-7083
dc.identifier.doi10.1308/rcsann.2022.0140
dc.identifier.pmid37642164
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/2358
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Staging laparoscopy (SL) has become commonplace in the preoperative staging pathway for oesophagogastric (OG) cancer. SL is often performed before curative treatment to examine for macroscopic peritoneal metastases (PM) or positive peritoneal cytology (PPC). The aim of this study was to develop an objective risk scoring system to predict both PM and PPC at SL. Methods: A prospectively collected and maintained database of all OG cancer patients treated between 2006 and 2020 was reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both PM and PPC at SL. A risk score was produced for both PM and PPC, and then validated internally. Results: Among 968 patients who underwent SL, 96 (9.9%) had PM and 81 (8.4%) had PPC at SL. Tumour site (p < 0.001), computed tomography (CT) T stage (p < 0.001) and N stage (p = 0.029) were significantly associated with PM at SL (p < 0.001). Tumour site (p < 0.001), biopsy histology (p = 0.041), CT T stage (p < 0.001) and N stage (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with PPC. The risk scoring model for PM included cancer site and CT T stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] = 0.730). The risk scoring model for PPC included cancer site, CT T and N stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (AUROC = 0.773). Conclusions: The current risk scores are valid tools with which to predict the risk PM and PPC in patients undergoing SL for OG cancer and may help to avoid subjecting patients to unnecessary SL.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoyal College of Surgeons of Englanden_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/386/en_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://publishing.rcseng.ac.uk/journal/ann
dc.subjectOncology. Pathology.en_US
dc.titleA preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patientsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorHalle-Smith, James M
dc.contributor.trustauthorKamarajah, Sivesh K
dc.contributor.trustauthorPande, Rupaly
dc.contributor.trustauthorWhiting, J L
dc.contributor.trustauthorGriffiths, Ewen A
dc.contributor.departmentGI/General Surgeryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.departmentLivery Surgery
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record