RSS 1.0Trauma and Orthopaedics
Collections in this community
Recent Submissions
-
Long-term effectiveness of intra-articular injectables in patients with knee osteoarthritis : a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysisBackground: Intra-articular injectables are proposed as a solution for pain relief and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis (OA), however most studies involving intra-articular knee injectables are focused on short-term relief, leaving the recommendations regarding long-term management unclear. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the mid- to long-term effectiveness of intra-articular knee injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroids (CS), and their combinations for management of knee OA. Methods: Relevant studies were searched through PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Register of Trials databases from inception to 20th October, 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of knee OA patients who had taken intra-articular injectable treatment with a follow-up duration of at least one year. The study included 37 RCTs involving 5089 patients. The outcomes assessed were pain relief and functional improvement of knee joint. The random effects Bayesian model was carried out for network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve demonstrated the rank probability of each injectable therapy for different outcomes. Results: Analysis revealed that, in terms of both knee pain relief and improvement of functional outcomes, the combined intra-articular injection of PRP and HA was ranked ahead of the isolated administration of PRP, followed by combination of HA with CS, HA alone, placebo, and CS at the end of one year. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the sustained efficacy of PRP, particularly when combined with HA, in providing superior long-term pain relief and functional improvement in knee OA compared to other intra-articular injectables, highlighting its potential as a preferred treatment modality.
-
Avoiding never events in orthopaedics theatres : a quality improvement projectNever events in the operating room are a surgeon's nightmare, with an incidence rate of 54%. These events are highly stressful for theatre staff and significantly compromise patient safety. The aim of this project is to avoid never events in trauma and orthopaedic theatres by ensuring that theatre staff adhere to the surgical pause and imaging pause protocols through regular audits.This prospective study was conducted in both trauma and elective orthopaedic theatres. It involved theatre staff members who were not part of the surgical team. The study was designed to take place on random days across different theatres, with the operating team unaware of the audit to ensure genuine behaviour and compliance.The audits focused on observing whether the surgical and imaging pause protocols were followed correctly. These protocols are critical for verifying patient identity, the surgical site, and the specific procedure and confirming the correct imaging is available and reviewed before proceeding. Data collected and corrective actions were implemented when non-compliance was observed, and data on compliance rates were systematically collected and analysed.Preliminary results indicate a substantial increase in compliance with both the surgical and imaging pause protocols, corresponding with a reduction in the occurrence of never events. Theatre staff reported improved understanding and confidence in performing these safety checks The use of external auditors who were not part of the surgical team provided an unbiased assessment of compliance, enhancing the reliability of the findings.In conclusion, the project demonstrates that regular audits, and data collected by non-surgical team staff, significantly improve adherence to surgical and imaging pause protocols, thereby reducing the incidence of never events in trauma and orthopaedic theatres. This approach highlights the importance of continuous monitoring and education in fostering a culture of safety and precision in surgical practice.
-
Artificial intelligence (AI) for paediatric fracture detection : a multireader multicase (MRMC) study protocolIntroduction: Paediatric fractures are common but can be easily missed on radiography leading to potentially serious implications including long-term pain, disability and missed opportunities for safeguarding in cases of inflicted injury. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools to assist fracture detection in adult patients exist, although their efficacy in children is less well known. This study aims to evaluate whether a commercially available AI tool (certified for paediatric use) improves healthcare professionals (HCPs) detection of fractures, and how this may impact patient care in a retrospective simulated study design. Methods and analysis: Using a multicentric dataset of 500 paediatric radiographs across four body parts, the diagnostic performance of HCPs will be evaluated across two stages-first without, followed by with the assistance of an AI tool (BoneView, Gleamer) after an interval 4-week washout period. The dataset will contain a mixture of normal and abnormal cases. HCPs will be recruited across radiology, orthopaedics and emergency medicine. We will aim for 40 readers, with ~14 in each subspecialty, half being experienced consultants. For each radiograph HCPs will evaluate presence of a fracture, their confidence level and a suitable simulated management plan. Diagnostic accuracy will be judged against a consensus interpretation by an expert panel of two paediatric radiologists (ground truth). Multilevel logistic modelling techniques will analyse and report diagnostic accuracy outcome measures for fracture detection. Descriptive statistics will evaluate changes in simulated patient management. Ethics and dissemination: This study was granted approval by National Health Service Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (REC Reference: 22/PR/0334). IRAS Project ID is 274 278. Funding has been provided by the National Institute for Heath and Care Research (NIHR) (Grant ID: NIHR-301322). Findings from this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and non-peer-reviewed media and social media outlets.
-
Understanding medical students' perceptions of failure in medical schoolThis paper explores medical students' perceptions of failure through a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews to gather insights from six students across different academic years at Queen Mary University of London. The study aims to understand how students define failure, its causes, and its impact on their academic and personal lives. Key findings reveal that failure is perceived as multifaceted, influenced by internal and external expectations, and evolves throughout medical school. The impact of failure is significant, affecting students' motivation, mental health, and coping mechanisms. While students sought both formal and informal support, barriers such as stigma and a lack of awareness hindered access to help. The study concludes that fostering an open dialogue on failure and integrating support systems could improve students' experiences, better preparing them for the uncertainties of clinical practice. Limitations include the small sample size and focus on a single institution. Further research is suggested to broaden the understanding of failure at different stages of medical education.
-
Impact of virtual clinics on streamlining NHS outpatient waiting lists and carbon emissionsBackground: The National Health Service (NHS) outpatient waiting list is growing, affecting specialties like foot and ankle. Delays are due to increasing demand, limited resources, and administrative inefficiencies. Virtual clinics are being explored to reduce physical clinic burdens and provide timely care. This study investigates the effectiveness of virtual clinics in reducing prolonged waiting times in the foot and ankle specialty. Emissions from personal vehicles are a primary driver of climate change, which is a little recognized benefit of virtual clinics. Methods: We analyzed outcomes from a virtual elective foot and ankle clinic, overseen by a specialist consultant, for new elective referrals over 4 months. Data for 175 patients were collected from Lorenzo, our electronic health records system. We also assessed the success rate of virtual consultations in terms of accurate diagnoses and effective treatment plans. Measured distance to the hospital based was on patients' residential address. Results: The virtual clinic effectively managed patients. Of the 175 patients, 48.6% completed treatment, and were discharged, and 53.7% were managed without face-to-face consultations. In addition, 66.3% did not need in-person visits; this includes patients treated and discharged and who were referred for investigations. In this clinic, avoiding 1 visit to the hospital by 116 patients saved travel of 1040 miles. Conclusion: The widespread adoption of virtual clinics can provide a convenient and cost-effective health care solution for patients and also potentially help reduce carbon emissions contributing to control global warming. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
-
Weight bearing versus non-weight bearing total contact cast in the management of active Charcot foot : a systematic reviewAim: Diabetic Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy carries a significant worldwide disease burden including diabetic foot infection, ulceration and amputation. The current accepted standard of treatment during the active phase of Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy is offloading with total contact casting; however, controversy remains regarding weight-bearing status during this period. Methods: A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines of Pubmed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials for clinical studies from inception until June 2024 investigating weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing total contact casting for active Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy. Results: Four hundred ninety-three studies were identified in the search strategy of which 5 studies met the inclusion criteria comprising 158 patients. These studies found that allowing patients to weight-bear during total contact casting does not have a negative impact on the healing process. There were no comparative studies between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing total contact casting. Conclusions: There is limited evidence to support current practice of non-weight bearing in a total contact casting for active Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy. Allowing patients to weight bear carries advantages to patient independence and quality of life. Further investigation with randomised control trial should be considered to investigate if weight bearing is associated with negative outcomes.
-
Hand Osteomyelitis : a systematic review of the literature and recommendations for diagnosis and managementHand osteomyelitis is a complex condition to diagnose and treat, with an opportunity to improve care through organization of existing evidence. The literature was systematically searched for series of hand osteomyelitis between 1990 and 2022 for evidence regarding diagnosis and treatment, to formulate recommendations. Twenty-one series reported at least 5 cases of hand osteomyelitis in adults, with a total of 666 cases. Surgical debridement is central to treatment and oral antibiotics are sufficient for individuals without diabetes, renal or vascular disease, after debridement and resolution of associated sepsis. A 4- to 6-week duration of antibiotic therapy according to organism sensitivities is recommended, or a 2-week course after amputation. Delayed presentation is common and if over 6 months is associated with high amputation rates. Hand osteomyelitis with renal failure is associated with systemic complications. Reconstruction options include antibiotic-eluting spacers, osteosynthesis or arthrodesis, vascularized bone or adipose, regional soft tissue coverage and silicone implant arthroplasty.Level of Evidence: IV.
-
Patient perspectives on elective orthopaedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison between patients from different ethnic backgrounds.Introduction: Suspending elective surgery during the first wave of coronavirus (COVID-19) led to record-breaking numbers of patients on waiting lists. Patients in Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) groups are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. This study compares the perspectives of patients from different ethnic backgrounds on the return to elective surgery. Methods: Some 151 patients were sampled from cancelled operating lists at two hospitals. Semi-structured interviews focused on the impact of COVID-19, and views about resuming elective surgery. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-iten Scale (GAD-7) measured anxiety. A visual analogue scale (VAS) measured pain. Data were analysed using exploratory thematic analysis. Results: Fewer BAME patients were pleased about restarting surgery, compared with white patients (47.3% vs 82.6%, p<0.001), and a greater proportion wanted to postpone their operation until after the pandemic (21.8% vs 9.3%, p=0.048). White/white British patients had higher GAD-7 scores (2 (0-21) vs 0 (0-16), p=0.009). Black/Black British patients had significantly higher VAS scores compared with white/white British and Asian/Asian British patients (85 vs 75 vs 70 respectively, p<0.05). Conclusion: The delay in surgery due to the pandemic has had a devastating impact on patients awaiting operations. The variation in pain and anxiety levels between ethnic groups must be addressed when redesigning services to avoid discrepancies in postoperative clinical outcomes. Patients in BAME groups are more likely to postpone their operation, which may lead to further health deterioration, psychosocial and socio-economic consequences, and poorer clinical outcomes following surgery. The thoughts, feelings and concerns of all must be considered when redesigning services to prevent health inequalities between patients from different backgrounds.
-
Patient Satisfaction With the Head and Neck Cancer Telephone Triage Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Background A telephone triage consultation, as part of the two-week wait head and neck cancer referral pathway, was implemented nationally in March 2020. This was in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to stream cancer referrals to minimize unnecessary interactions and appointments with health services. The aim of this study is to assess patient satisfaction with this novel telephone triage system in the setting of a district general hospital. Methods A custom designed patient satisfaction questionnaire covering different facets of the patient experience was used. These questions were adapted from several internally validated questionnaires. A retrospective telephone survey was conducted by interviewers for all continuous new head and neck cancer referrals over two 4-week periods in 2020. Questionnaire responses to the initial modality of consult (either telephone triage or face to face) were collected, and data were analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Results Seventy-five responses were received, with 51 patients providing feedback on an initial telephone triage consultation. Patients rated the telephone triage consultation to be between satisfied and very satisfied across most domains, with an overall score of 4.29 out of 5. Accessibility and efficiency of the telephone triage were the domains with the least satisfaction. Fifty-five percent of patients would be happy to receive a similar telephone triage consultation beyond the pandemic. Qualitative analysis showed praise for the safety and convenience of the telephone triage consultation during the pandemic but highlighted a general preference for a face-to-face consultation and dissatisfaction regarding a lack of physical examination. Conclusions Overall, patients are satisfied with the telephone triage consultation employed in the pandemic, with high satisfaction rates for multiple aspects of care. However, there were concerns regarding the accessibility and inefficiency associated with a lack of/delayed physical examination and inability to adequately address the fear and anxiety associated with the referral. A mixed response is obtained on whether the telephone triage system should stay for the long run.
-
Review of orthopaedic trauma surgery during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic - An observational cohort study in the UK.Aim: This study aims to estimate the risk of acquiring medical complication or death from COVID-19 infection in patients who were admitted for orthopaedic trauma surgery during the peak and plateau of pandemic. Unlike other recently published studies, where patient-cohort included a more morbid group and cancer surgeries, we report on a group of patients who had limb surgery and were more akin to elective orthopaedic surgery. Methods: The study included 214 patients who underwent orthopaedic trauma surgeries in the hospital between 12th March and 12th May-2020 when the pandemic was on the rise in the United Kingdom. Data was collected on demographic profile including comorbidities, ASA grade, COVID-19 testing, type of procedures and any readmissions, complications or mortality due to COVID-19. Results: There were 7.9% readmissions and 52.9% of it was for respiratory complications. Only one patient had positive COVID-19 test during readmission. 30-day mortality for trauma surgeries was 0% if hip fractures were excluded and 2.8% in all patients. All the mortalities were for proximal femur fracture surgeries and between ASA Grade 3 and 4 or in patients above the age of 70 years. Conclusion: This study suggests that presence of COVID-19 virus in the community and hospital did not adversely affect the outcome of orthopaedic trauma surgeries or lead to excess mortality or readmissions in patients undergoing limb trauma surgery. The findings also support resumption of elective orthopaedic surgeries with appropriate risk stratification, patient optimization and with adequate infrastructural support amidst the recovery phase of the pandemic.
-
The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.Background: The use of computer navigation has been shown to produce more accurate cup positioning when compared with non-navigated total hip arthroplasty (THA), but so far there is only limited evidence to show its effect on clinical outcomes. The present study analyzed data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry to assess the impact of computer navigation on the rates of all-cause revision and revision for dislocation following THA. Methods: Data for all non-navigated and navigated primary THAs performed for osteoarthritis in Australia from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019, were examined to assess the rate of revision. We analyzed the effects of navigation on rate, reason, and type of revision. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, sex, and head size, were utilized. Because of known prosthesis-specific differences in outcomes, we performed a further analysis of the 5 acetabular and femoral component combinations most commonly used with navigation. Results: Computer navigation was utilized in 6,912 primary THAs for osteoarthritis, with the use of navigation increasing from 1.9% in 2009 to 4.4% of all primary THAs performed in 2019. There was no difference in the rate of all-cause revision between navigated and non-navigated THAs looking at the entire group. There was a lower rate of revision for dislocation in the navigation THA cohort. The cumulative percent revision for dislocation at 10 years was 0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2% to 0.6%) for navigated compared with 0.8% (95% CI, 0.8% to 0.9%) for non-navigated THAs (HR adjusted for age, sex, and head size, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.74; p = 0.002). In the 5 component combinations most commonly used with navigation, the rate of all-cause revision was significantly lower when these components were navigated compared with non-navigated. The cumulative percent revision at 10 years for these 5 prostheses combined was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.6% to 3.4%) for navigated compared with 4.2% (95% CI, 4.0% to 4.5%) for non-navigated THAs (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.86; p = 0.003). Conclusions: This study showed that the use of computer navigation was associated with a reduced rate of revision for dislocation following THA. Furthermore, in the component combinations most commonly used with navigation there was also a reduction in the rate of all-cause revision. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
-
Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Hip Fracture Fixation: A Study Combining Surgical Experience and Fracture ComplexityAim Hip fracture fixation surgeries are one of the most common surgeries that every trauma unit does regularly. Surgical training and expertise to fix these fractures properly are quite crucial for every orthopaedic surgeon. Therefore, orthopaedic training programmes all over the world consider significant focus on this and teach trainee surgeons expectantly to manage these fractures independently. Surgical fixation of hip fractures often requires fluoroscopy assistance in the operating theatre with associated hazards from ionising radiation. Moreover, hip fractures can be sometimes quite complex and may require relatively more fluoroscopy usage even with the higher grade of the operating surgeons. Therefore, training need for hip fracture fixation surgery is imperative and there is also a need for intraoperative radiation safety. This study has tried to find a balance between intraoperative fluoroscopic radiation exposure, surgical training requirement, and hip fracture complexity. Methodology This single centre study has collected retrospective peri-operative data over a period of two years including hip fractures that required fluoroscopy-guided surgical fixation. Femoral head fractures, subtrochanteric fractures, diaphyseal fractures, and trochanteric fractures with associated pelvic fractures were excluded from the study. We collected data on demographic parameters, fracture complexity and grading (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA] Classification), intraoperative ionising radiation exposure (centi-Gray/cm2), and grade of the operating surgeon in order to find any relation between these factors. Results Total 268 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 81.8 years (SD 9.3) comprising of 83 (31%) male patients and 185 (69%) female patients. The study population was further stratified into three groups depending upon the operating grade of the surgeon: ‘Junior Trainee’ (<five years of experience; 77 cases [29%]); ‘Senior Trainee’ (>five years of experience; 148 cases [55%]); and ‘Consultant’ (fully trained to practice independently; 43 cases [16%]). There was no statistically significant difference among these three sub-groups with regards to the age (p = 0.79), gender (p = 0.73), body mass index (p = 0.46), and fracture pattern (p = 0.96) of the patients. However, consultants tend to operate more on the higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade patients (p = 0.049) with more comorbidities. There was statistically significant higher fluoroscopic radiation exposure while junior trainee surgeons (p = 0.005) were operating and during the higher complex grade of hip fracture (p = <0.001) fixation. Conclusion In conclusion, the quantity of intra-operative radiation dose utilised in the surgical fixation of hip fractures is significantly associated with the grade and level of training of the operating surgeon and fracture complexity type. The results of this study emphasise and support the importance of comprehensive, supervised, and structured orthopaedic training for in-theatre radiation safety. It is recommended to have a safe balance between teaching, learning, and prevention of ionising radiation hazards in order to optimally achieve trainee’s professional development with successful patient outcomes.
-
Radiological outcomes following surgical fixation with wires versus moulded cast for patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius : a radiographic analysis from the DRAFFT2 trialAims: The primary aim of this study was to report the radiological outcomes of patients with a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture who were randomized to a moulded cast or surgical fixation with wires following manipulation and closed reduction of their fracture. The secondary aim was to correlate radiological outcomes with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the year following injury. Methods: Participants were recruited as part of DRAFFT2, a UK multicentre clinical trial. Participants were aged 16 years or over with a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture, and were eligible for the trial if they needed a manipulation of their fracture, as recommended by their treating surgeon. Participants were randomly allocated on a 1:1 ratio to moulded cast or Kirschner wires after manipulation of the fracture in the operating theatre. Standard posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were performed in the radiology department of participating centres at the time of the patient's initial assessment in the emergency department and six weeks postoperatively. Intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken at the time of fracture reduction were also assessed. Results: Patients treated with surgical fixation with wires had less dorsal angulation of the radius versus those treated in a moulded cast at six weeks after manipulation of the fracture; the mean difference of -4.13° was statistically significant (95% confidence interval 5.82 to -2.45). There was no evidence of a difference in radial shortening. However, there was no correlation between these radiological measurements and PROMs at any timepoint in the 12 months post-injury. Conclusion: For patients with a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture treated with a closed manipulation, surgical fixation with wires leads to less dorsal angulation on radiographs at six weeks compared with patients treated in a moulded plaster cast alone. However, the difference in dorsal angulation was small and did not correlate with patient-reported pain and function.
-
Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs. Open Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure: A Single Centre Experience.Introduction Hartmann's procedure is widely performed to fix colonic obstruction and perforation. It should ideally be followed by a reversal to restore bowel continuity. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure was traditionally performed using an open technique. However, in recent days, the use of a laparoscopic approach has become increasingly popular. In our retrospective observational study, we aim to investigate the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure in a UK tertiary centre. Methods All patients who underwent reversal of their Hartmann's procedure between January 2017 and December 2019 were included in the study. Data including demographics, days between primary operation and reversal, laparoscopic or open reversal, length of hospital stay following reversal procedure, 30-day readmission, mortality, and complication rate were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test and chi-squared test. Results Forty-nine patients underwent reversal of Hartmann's procedure from January 2017 to December 2019. The mean age of our cohort was 59.6 ± 13.2 years. There was no significant difference in baseline demographics of both groups, apart from the number of days between the primary operation and reversal procedure. There was also no statistical difference in length of stay, 30-day readmission, and mortality between laparoscopic and open reversal techniques. However, there was a higher incidence of wound complications in patients who underwent open reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Conclusion The reversal of Hartmann's procedure is a challenging operation. We found no significant difference between both open and laparoscopic approaches, but our study might be confounded by various factors including small sample size and selection bias. A larger, randomised study with greater statistical power is needed to confirm our findings.
-
Intra-articular steroid alone vs hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroid in frozen shoulder - A Randomised Control TrialIntroduction: Various non-operative treatment modalities have been advocated for a frozen shoulder. In the present study we compared the efficacy of single intra-articular steroid injection vs hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroids for frozen shoulder (FS) in the frozen phase. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomised control trial (RCT) done at a tertiary care centre. A total of 108 participants were randomised into two groups-one group received intra-articular steroid with hydrodilatation (HDS) and other group received intra-articular steroid injection only (S). Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores were taken, and statistical analysis was done to measure the outcome at two weeks, six weeks and three-month intervals after the injection. Result: There was significant improvement in symptoms at each interval for both the groups (p=0.0). There was no statistically significant difference in the SPADI score between the two groups at two weeks post injection, however at six weeks (p=0.04) and 3 months (p=0.001) significant difference in the SPADI score was demonstrated with better scores in group S. The mean duration of analgesia required in group HDS was 5.17 days (S.D.=1.73) and for group S was 4.28 days (S.D.=1.01), with a statistical significance (p=0.002). Conclusion: Better clinical results were obtained at six weeks and three months with the group receiving corticosteroid only and also had a lesser requirement of analgesia post-intervention. Thus, intra-articular steroid injection only seems to be a more desirable method of management during the frozen phase of FS than that of hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroid injection.
-
A national multicentre study of outcomes and patient satisfaction with the virtual fracture clinic and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic : the MAVCOV studyBackground: Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are advocated by the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). We aimed to assess the impact of the transition from face-to-face fracture clinic review and identify any change in clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. Methods: A national, cross-sectional cohort study of VFCs across the UK over two separate two-week periods pre- and during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown was undertaken. Data comprising patient and injury characteristics, unplanned reattendance and complications within three months following discharge from VFC were collected by local collaborators. Telephone questionnaires were conducted to determine patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcome for patients discharged without face-to-face consultation. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of unplanned reattendances after direct discharge from VFC. Results: Data was analysed for 51 UK VFCs comprising 6134 patients from the pre-pandemic group (06/05/2019-19/05/2019) and 4366 patients from the first UK lockdown (04/05/2020-17/05/2020). During lockdown, the rate of direct discharge from VFC increased significantly (odds ratio (OR) 2.01, p<0.001) from 30 % (n = 1856/6134) to 46 % (n = 2021/4366). The rate of compliance with BOAST guidance recommending fracture clinic review within three days increased (OR 1.93, p<0.001) from 82 % (n = 5003/6134) to 89 % (n = 3883/4366). There were no differences in the rates of unplanned reattendance (6 % pre- and 7 % during lockdown, p = 0.281) or complications (0.2 % for both, p = 0.815). There were 1527/3877 patients discharged without face-to-face review from VFC who completed telephone questionnaires (mean follow-up 18-months in pre-pandemic group and 6-months in lockdown group). Satisfaction was high in both cohorts (80 % pre- and 76 % lockdown, p = 0.093). Dissatisfaction was associated with an unplanned reattendance (p<0.001) or a missed injury (p<0.05). Conclusion: Despite a significant rise in direct discharge from VFC, there was no significant change in unplanned attendances, complications, or patient satisfaction. However, there are factors associated with dissatisfaction and these should be considered in the evolution of VFC.
-
Evaluating the measures in patient-reported outcomes, values and experiences (EMPROVE study) : a collaborative audit of PROMs practice in orthopaedic care in the United KingdomIntroduction: All national orthopaedic societies advocate the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), but clear guidance on their use is limited. We utilised a collaborative methodology to perform a national audit aiming to assess the perceived variability in PROMs practice in orthopaedic surgery in the United Kingdom. Methods: A multicentre collaborative audit of practice was performed extracting PROMs data on 21 commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. For each procedure, data were collected for frequency of PROM collection, type of PROM chosen, administration intervals, method and reason for collection. Compliance with national society recommendations was undertaken. Results: Sixty-three trusts enrolled to participate in the study with a completion rate of 60% (38 trusts). The most frequently reported PROMs were those associated with best practice tariffs (83.3% and 80.6% for hip and knee replacements, respectively). Outside incentivised programmes we observed a higher rate of variation in PROMs practice which failed to meet our audit standard. Across all procedures evaluated, 69% (221/318) of respondents to the study used paper as the primary method of PROM collection. Conclusions: This is the first national audit of PROMs collection in orthopaedics. The integration of PROMs within best practice tariff platforms positively influences the frequency and standardisation of collection. Outside this initiative, PROMS collection is infrequent and highly varied despite the presence of several registries. Because PROMs collection is a recommendation across all procedures using implantable devices, the success of this will depend on the adequacy of funding, resource delivery and the presence of clearer recommendations.
-
The ORthopaedic Trauma Hospital Outcomes - Patient Operative Delays (ORTHOPOD) studyAims: This is a multicentre, prospective assessment of a proportion of the overall orthopaedic trauma caseload of the UK. It investigates theatre capacity, cancellations, and time to surgery in a group of hospitals that is representative of the wider population. It identifies barriers to effective practice and will inform system improvements. Methods: Data capture was by collaborative approach. Patients undergoing procedures from 22 August 2022 and operated on before 31 October 2022 were included. Arm one captured weekly caseload and theatre capacity. Arm two concerned patient and injury demographics, and time to surgery for specific injury groups. Results: Data was available from 90 hospitals across 86 data access groups (70 in England, two in Wales, ten in Scotland, and four in Northern Ireland). After exclusions, 709 weeks' of data on theatre capacity and 23,138 operations were analyzed. The average number of cases per operating session was 1.73. Only 5.8% of all theatre sessions were dedicated day surgery sessions, despite 29% of general trauma patients being eligible for such pathways. In addition, 12.3% of patients experienced at least one cancellation. Delays to surgery were longest in Northern Ireland and shortest in England and Scotland. There was marked variance across all fracture types. Open fractures and fragility hip fractures, influenced by guidelines and performance renumeration, had short waits, and varied least. In all, nine hospitals had 40 or more patients waiting for surgery every week, while seven had less than five. Conclusion: There is great variability in operative demand and list provision seen in this study of 90 UK hospitals. There is marked variation in nearly all injuries apart from those associated with performance monitoring. There is no evidence of local network level coordination of care for orthopaedic trauma patients. Day case operating and pathways of care are underused and are an important area for service improvement.
-
Cost-utility analysis of surgical fixation with Kirschner wire versus casting after fracture of the distal radius : a health economic evaluation of the DRAFFT2 trialAims: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of surgical fixation with Kirschner (K-)wire ersus moulded casting after manipulation of a fracture of the distal radius in an operating theatre setting. Methods: An economic evaluation was conducted based on data collected from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial 2 (DRAFFT2) multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK. Resource use was collected at three, six, and 12 months post-randomization using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from an NHS and personal social services perspective. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of cost-effectiveness estimates, and decision uncertainty was handled using confidence ellipses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Results: In the base case analysis, surgical fixation with K-wire was more expensive (£29.65 (95% confidence interval (CI) -94.85 to 154.15)) and generated lower QALYs (0.007 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.016)) than moulded casting, but this difference was not statistically significant. The probability of K-wire being cost-effective at a £20,000 per QALY cost-effectiveness threshold was 24%. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: The findings suggest that surgical fixation with K-wire is unlikely to be a cost-effective alternative to a moulded cast in adults, following manipulation of a fracture of the distal radius in a theatre setting.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1225-1233.