Italian translation and validation of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8)
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Zeri, FabrizioTavazzi, Silvia
Naroo, Shehzad A
Recchioni, Alberto

Menduni, Francesco
Ponzini, Erika
Chalmers, Robin
Desiato, Alfredo
Affiliation
University of Milano-Bicocca; Aston University; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustPublication date
2023-04-04Subject
Ophthalmology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: To translate and validate an Italian version of the CLDEQ-8 (CLDEQ-8_IT). Methods: The study was carried out in two phases. In the first phase, a cross-cultural adaptation of CLDEQ-8 to Italian was performed by forward and backward translation in sequence. In the second phase, a multi-centre study was conducted for the validation of the questionnaire. Validity CLDEQ-8_IT was evaluated against three gestalt questions: overall opinion of soft contact lenses (CLs), global self-assessments of eye sensitivity and eye dryness. Reliability was evaluated by test-retest assessment in a subgroup of subjects. Finally, the psychometric properties of CLDEQ-8_IT were explored by Rasch analysis. Results: Two hundred and forty soft CL wearers, fluent Italian speakers (73 males and 167 females), between 18 and 70 years of age were enrolled. A significant correlation was found between CLDEQ-8_IT and each of the three Gestalt questions. The cutoff score of 12 points demonstrated the best balance between sensitivity and specificity in differentiating wearers grading their CLs as "Excellent/Very good" from those reporting their overall opinion as "Good/Fair/Poor". The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient between test and retest was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.92). Finally, infit and outfit statistics using Rasch analysis for the 8 items were in a good range, however Principal Components Analysis revealed a certain degree of multi-dimensionality of the instrument. Also, item 8 analysis could be computed after merging the last two response categories. Conclusion: The CLDEQ-8_IT showed very good validity and reliability in measuring symptoms of CL wearers, comparable to the original English language version. A cut-off of 12 was confirmed as yielding the best balance between sensitivity and specificity in detecting CL wearers who could benefit from clinical management of their CL-related symptoms. Collapsing of the response options 5 and 6 in the last item of questionnaire could optimise its functioning.Citation
Zeri F, Tavazzi S, Naroo SA, Recchioni A, Menduni F, Ponzini E, Chalmers R, Desiato A. Italian translation and validation of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8). Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Jun;46(3):101842. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101842.Type
ArticlePMID
37024414Journal
Contact Lens & Anterior EyePublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.clae.2023.101842