Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZeri, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.authorTavazzi, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorNaroo, Shehzad A
dc.contributor.authorRecchioni, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorMenduni, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorPonzini, Erika
dc.contributor.authorChalmers, Robin
dc.contributor.authorDesiato, Alfredo
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-17T13:48:42Z
dc.date.available2023-10-17T13:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-04
dc.identifier.citationZeri F, Tavazzi S, Naroo SA, Recchioni A, Menduni F, Ponzini E, Chalmers R, Desiato A. Italian translation and validation of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8). Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Jun;46(3):101842. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101842.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1476-5411
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clae.2023.101842
dc.identifier.pmid37024414
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/2579
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To translate and validate an Italian version of the CLDEQ-8 (CLDEQ-8_IT). Methods: The study was carried out in two phases. In the first phase, a cross-cultural adaptation of CLDEQ-8 to Italian was performed by forward and backward translation in sequence. In the second phase, a multi-centre study was conducted for the validation of the questionnaire. Validity CLDEQ-8_IT was evaluated against three gestalt questions: overall opinion of soft contact lenses (CLs), global self-assessments of eye sensitivity and eye dryness. Reliability was evaluated by test-retest assessment in a subgroup of subjects. Finally, the psychometric properties of CLDEQ-8_IT were explored by Rasch analysis. Results: Two hundred and forty soft CL wearers, fluent Italian speakers (73 males and 167 females), between 18 and 70 years of age were enrolled. A significant correlation was found between CLDEQ-8_IT and each of the three Gestalt questions. The cutoff score of 12 points demonstrated the best balance between sensitivity and specificity in differentiating wearers grading their CLs as "Excellent/Very good" from those reporting their overall opinion as "Good/Fair/Poor". The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient between test and retest was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.92). Finally, infit and outfit statistics using Rasch analysis for the 8 items were in a good range, however Principal Components Analysis revealed a certain degree of multi-dimensionality of the instrument. Also, item 8 analysis could be computed after merging the last two response categories. Conclusion: The CLDEQ-8_IT showed very good validity and reliability in measuring symptoms of CL wearers, comparable to the original English language version. A cut-off of 12 was confirmed as yielding the best balance between sensitivity and specificity in detecting CL wearers who could benefit from clinical management of their CL-related symptoms. Collapsing of the response options 5 and 6 in the last item of questionnaire could optimise its functioning.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectOphthalmologyen_US
dc.titleItalian translation and validation of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8)en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleContact Lens & Anterior Eye
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorRecchioni, Alberto
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Milano-Bicocca; Aston University; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trusten_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record