• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust
    • Medicine and Long-Term Conditions
    • Dermatology
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust
    • Medicine and Long-Term Conditions
    • Dermatology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of West Midlands Evidence RepositoryCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutPolicies Privacy NoticeBlack Country Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS TrustDudley Group NHS Foundation TrustGeorge Eliot Hospital NHS TrustSandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustSouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustWalsall Healthcare NHS Trust

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    International, prospective cohort study comparing non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures for skin surgery : CANVAS service evaluation

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Lee, Alice
    Stanley, Guy H M
    Wade, Ryckie G
    Berwick, Daniele
    Vinicombe, Victoria
    Salence, Brogan K
    Musbahi, Esra
    De Poli, Anderson R C S
    Savu, Mihaela
    Batchelor, Jonathan M
    Abbott, Rachel A
    Gardiner, Matthew D
    Wernham, Aaron cc
    Veitch, David
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Stoke Mandeville Hospital; Imperial College London; Fiona Stanley Hospital; University of Western Australia; University of Leeds; Leeds General Infirmary; Queen Victoria Hospital; Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust; Luton and Dunstable University Hospital; Yeovil District Hospital; University Hospital of Wales; Wexham Park Hospital; Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust,; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics; University of Oxford; Leicester University Hospitals NHS Trust; Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust
    Publication date
    2023-03
    Subject
    Dermatology
    Surgery
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Absorbable or non-absorbable sutures can be used for superficial skin closure following excisional skin surgery. There is no consensus among clinicians nor high-quality evidence supporting the choice of suture. The aim of the present study was to determine current suture use and complications at 30 days after excisional skin surgery. Methods: An international, prospective service evaluation of adults undergoing excision of skin lesions (benign and malignant) in primary and secondary care was conducted from 1 September 2020 to 15 April 2021. Routine patient data collected by UK and Australasian collaborator networks were uploaded to REDCap©. Choice of suture and risk of complications were modelled using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Some 3494 patients (4066 excisions) were included; 3246 (92.9 per cent) were from the UK and Ireland. Most patients were men (1945, 55.7 per cent), Caucasian (2849, 81.5 per cent) and aged 75-84 years (965, 27.6 per cent). The most common clinical diagnosis was basal cell carcinoma (1712, 42.1 per cent). Dermatologists performed most procedures, with 1803 excisions (44.3 per cent) on 1657 patients (47.4 per cent). Most defects were closed primarily (2856, 81.9 per cent), and there was equipoise in regard to use of absorbable (2127, 57.7 per cent) or non-absorbable (1558, 42.2 per cent) sutures for superficial closure. The most common complications were surgical-site infection (103, 2.9 per cent) and delayed wound healing (77, 2.2 per cent). In multivariable analysis, use of absorbable suture type was associated with increased patient age, geographical location (UK and Ireland), and surgeon specialty (oral and maxillofacial surgery and plastic surgery), but not with complications. Conclusion: There was equipoise in suture use, and no association between suture type and complications. Definitive evidence from randomized trials is needed.
    Citation
    Lee A, Stanley GHM, Wade RG, Berwick D, Vinicombe V, Salence BK, Musbahi E, De Poli ARCS, Savu M, Batchelor JM, Abbott RA, Gardiner MD, Wernham A, Veitch D; CANVAS collaborative. International, prospective cohort study comparing non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures for skin surgery: CANVAS service evaluation. Br J Surg. 2023 Mar 30;110(4):462-470.
    Type
    Article
    Handle
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/2581
    DOI
    10.1093/bjs/znad008
    PMID
    36753053
    Journal
    British Journal of Surgery
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1093/bjs/znad008
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Dermatology

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.