Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaduemem, Kene
dc.contributor.authorClark, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorSohal, Iseult
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Tom
dc.contributor.authorMakwana, Niten
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T13:12:31Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T13:12:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-19
dc.identifier.citationMaduemem K, Clark H, Sohal I, Dawson T, Makwana N; Paediatric Research Across the Midlands (PRAM) Network. Barriers to paediatric penicillin allergy de-labelling in UK secondary care: a regional survey. Arch Dis Child. 2023 May;108(5):363-366. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324564en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2044
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/archdischild-2022-324564
dc.identifier.pmid36535750
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/2627
dc.description.abstractBackground: Incorrect penicillin allergy labels result in the use of inappropriately broad-spectrum antibiotics. De-labelling inaccurate penicillin allergy promotes antimicrobial stewardship and optimises prescribing practices. The objectives were to evaluate paediatric clinicians' knowledge and understanding of penicillin allergy and to identify barriers in tackling incorrect penicillin allergy labels. Methods: Paediatric clinicians from across the West Midlands of the UK were surveyed using an online, anonymised questionnaire between 1 August and 30 September 2021. Domains explored were (1) approach to penicillin allergy clinical vignettes, (2) knowledge of the impact of penicillin allergy labels, (3) frequency of allergy-focused history questions and (4) barriers in tackling incorrect penicillin allergy. Results: Responses were received from 307 paediatric clinicians across 12 hospitals. Sixty-one per cent would not prescribe a penicillin-based antibiotic if a family history of penicillin allergy was reported. There was an overall deficit in taking an allergy-focused history with only 36.5% inquiring about diagnostic confirmation. Absence, or lack of awareness of a referral pathway for antibiotic allergy evaluation (58.6%) and unfamiliarity of the indications for oral provocation testing (55%) were the most common reported barriers to penicillin allergy de-labelling. Fifty-one per cent would rather 'play it safe' than explore penicillin allergy confirmation as it is felt that alternative treatments were readily available. Conclusions: The deficiency in antibiotic allergy-focused history among paediatric clinicians highlights the need for better allergy education across all clinical grades. Pragmatic algorithms and clear referral pathways could address barriers faced by non-allergists in de-labelling incorrect penicillin allergy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.subjectPaediatricsen_US
dc.titleBarriers to paediatric penicillin allergy de-labelling in UK secondary care : a regional surveyen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleArchives of Disease in Childhood
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorMakwana, Niten
dc.contributor.departmentPaediatricsen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust; University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trusten_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record