General practice (GP) level analysis shows that patients' own perceptions of support within primary care as reported in the GP patient survey (GPPS) are as important as medication and services in improving glycaemic control
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
University of Manchester; Salford Royal Hospital; Res Consortium; Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust; High Speciality Regional Hospital of Ixtapaluca; Warwick Medical SchoolPublication date
2019-05-24
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: The way that GP practices organize their services impacts as much on glycaemia in type 2 diabetes as does prescribing. Aim: Our aim was to evaluate the link between patients' own perception of support within primary care and the % patients at each GP practice at target glycaemic control (TGC) and at high glycaemic risk (HGR). Design and setting: Utilisation of National Diabetes Audit (NDA) available data combined with the General practitioner patient survey (GPPS). Method: The NDA 2016_17 published data on numbers of type 2 patients, levels of local diabetes services and the target glycaemic control (TGC) % and high glycaemic risk (HGR) % achieved. The GPPS 2017 published % "No" responses from long term condition (LTC) patients to the question "In the last 6 months, had you enough support from local services or organisations to help manage LTCs?". Multivariate regression was used on the set of indicators capturing patients' demographics and services provided. Results: 6498 practices were included (with more than 2.5 million T2DM patients) and median values with band limits that included 95% practices for % "No" response to the question above was 12% (2%-30%), for TGC 67% (54%-78%) and for HGR 6% (2%-13%). The model accounted for 25% TGC variance and 26% HGR variance. The standardised β values shown as (TGC/HGR) (+=more people; -=less people) for older age (+0.24/-0.25), sulphonylurea use (-0.21/+0.14), greater social disadvantage (-0.09/+0.21), GPPS Support %No (-0.08/+0.12), %Completion 8 checks (+0.09/-0.12) and metformin use (+0.11/-0.05). Conclusion: The relation between the person with diabetes and clinician in primary care is shown to be quantitatively potentially as important in influencing glycaemic outcome as the services provided and medication prescribed. We suggest that all of us in who work in the health care system can bear this in mind in our everyday work.Citation
Heald A, Stedman M, Lunt M, Livingston M, Cortes G, Gadsby R. General practice (GP) level analysis shows that patients' own perceptions of support within primary care as reported in the GP patient survey (GPPS) are as important as medication and services in improving glycaemic control. Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Feb;14(1):29-32.Type
ArticlePMID
31133530Journal
Primary Care DiabetesPublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.pcd.2019.04.005