Risk factors, diagnosis and management of chyle leak following esophagectomy for cancers: an international consensus statement.
Author
Kamarajah, Sivesh KSiddaiah-Subramanya, Manjunath
Parente, Alessandro
Evans, Richard P T
Adeyeye, Ademola
Ainsworth, Alan
Takahashi, Alberto M L
Charalabopoulos, Alex
Chang, Andrew
Eroglue, Atila
Wijnhoven, Bas
Donohoe, Claire
Molena, Daniela
Talavera-Urquijo, Eider
Takeda, Flavio Roberto
Darling, Gail
Rosero, German
Piessen, Guillaume
Mahendran, Hans
Kuei, Hsu Po
Gockel, Ines
Negoi, Ionut
Weindelmayer, Jacopo
Rasanen, Jari
Bekele, Kebebe
Kim, Guowei
Depypere, Lieven
Ferri, Lorenzo
Nilsson, Magnus
Klevebro, Frederik
Smithers, B Mark
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I
Grimminger, Peter
Schneider, Paul M
Pramesh, C S
Sayyed, Raza
Babor, Richard
Mine, Shinji
Law, Simon
Gisbertz, Suzanne
Bright, Tim
Benoit D'Journo, Xavier
Low, Donald
Singh, Pritam
Griffiths, Ewen A
Publication date
2022-08-29
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This Delphi exercise aimed to gather consensus surrounding risk factors, diagnosis, and management of chyle leaks after esophagectomy and to develop recommendations for clinical practice. Background: Chyle leaks following esophagectomy for malignancy are uncommon. Although they are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, diagnosis and management of these patients remain controversial and a challenge globally. Methods: This was a modified Delphi exercise was delivered to clinicians across the oesophagogastric anastomosis collaborative. A 5-staged iterative process was used to gather consensus on clinical practice, including a scoping systematic review (stage 1), 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting (stages 2 and 3), data-based analysis (stage 4), and guideline and consensus development (stage 5). Stratified analyses were performed by surgeon specialty and surgeon volume. Results: In stage 1, the steering committee proposed areas of uncertainty across 5 domains: risk factors, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management (ie, diagnosis, severity, and treatment). In stages 2 and 3, 275 and 250 respondents respectively participated in online voting. Consensus was achieved on intraoperative thoracic duct ligation, postoperative diagnosis by milky chest drain output and biochemical testing with triglycerides and chylomicrons, assessing severity with volume of chest drain over 24 hours and a step-up approach in the management of chyle leaks. Stratified analyses demonstrated consistent results. In stage 4, data from the Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit demonstrated that chyle leaks occurred in 5.4% (122/2247). Increasing chyle leak grades were associated with higher rates of pulmonary complications, return to theater, prolonged length of stay, and 90-day mortality. In stage 5, 41 surgeons developed a set of recommendations in the intraoperative techniques, diagnosis, and management of chyle leaks. Conclusions: Several areas of consensus were reached surrounding diagnosis and management of chyle leaks following esophagectomy for malignancy. Guidance in clinical practice through adaptation of recommendations from this consensus may help in the prevention of, timely diagnosis, and management of chyle leaks.Citation
Kamarajah SK, Siddaiah-Subramanya M, Parente A, Evans RPT, Adeyeye A, Ainsworth A, Takahashi AML, Charalabopoulos A, Chang A, Eroglue A, Wijnhoven B, Donohoe C, Molena D, Talavera-Urquijo E, Takeda FR, Darling G, Rosero G, Piessen G, Mahendran H, Kuei HP, Gockel I, Negoi I, Weindelmayer J, Rasanen J, Bekele K, Kim G, Depypere L, Ferri L, Nilsson M, Klevebro F, Smithers BM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Grimminger P, Schneider PM, Pramesh CS, Sayyed R, Babor R, Mine S, Law S, Gisbertz S, Bright T, Benoit D'Journo X, Low D, Singh P, Griffiths EA. Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Management of Chyle Leak Following Esophagectomy for Cancers: An International Consensus Statement. Ann Surg Open. 2022 Aug 29;3(3):e192. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000192Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://journals.lww.com/aosopen/pages/default.aspxPMID
36199483Journal
Annals of Surgery OpenPublisher
Wolters Kluwerae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/AS9.0000000000000192