Suture button fixation in Latarjet has similar load to failure and clinical outcomes but lower bone resorption compared with screw fixation - a systematic review
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Hali, Nayeem ZTahir, Muaaz
Jordan, Robert W
Laprus, Hubert
Woodmass, Jarret
D'Alessandro, Peter
Malik, Shahbaz S
Publication date
2023-10-25
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
11 studies met eligible criteria: seven clinical studies (SB, n=279; SF, n=845) and four biomechanical. 80.9% (SB) and 84.2% (SF) were males. Follow up ranged from 6-63.6months. The overall SB recurrent instability rate ranged from 0-8.3% and SF ranged from 0-2.75%. Only one study demonstrated higher recurrent instability rate with SB (p=0.02). Overall SB complication rate ranged from 0-12.5% and SF ranged from 0-27%. Two studies reported higher complications and reoperations with SF related to hardware. Summary forest plots from four studies showed no significant difference in Walch Duplay score [mean difference, range -5.00 to 1.20 (95% CI -12.13 to 8.56), I2 inconsistency = 0%], Rowe score [mean difference, range -2.00 to 4.00 (95% CI: -7.37 to 7.66), I2 inconsistency = 45%] and VAS for pain [mean difference, range -0.10 to 0.60 (95% CI -0.72 to 1.33, I2 inconsistency = 0%]. There was no statistically significant difference between SB and SF in the postoperative range of motion. Radiologically, there was no significant difference in graft positioning and union at final follow up, but graft resorption was higher in SF (range 25.2-47.6%) compared to SB (range 10.1-18.5%). Biomechanical studies showed no significant difference in maximum load to failure (SB, range184-266N vs. SF, range148-288N).Citation
Hali NZ, Tahir M, Jordan RW, Laprus H, Woodmass J, D'Alessandro P, Malik SS. Suture Button Fixation in Latarjet Has Similar Load to Failure and Clinical Outcomes but Lower Bone Resorption Compared With Screw Fixation: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2024 May;40(5):1637-1654. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.021.Type
ArticlePMID
37890545Journal
ArthroscopyPublisher
Raven Pressae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.021