Artificial intelligence assisted endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic space occupying lesion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing pancreatic lesions, including chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer, poses a challenge and, as a result, is time-consuming. To tackle this issue, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly utilized over the years. AI can analyze large data sets with heightened accuracy, reduce inter-observer variability, and can standardize the interpretation of radiologic and histopathologic lesions. Therefore, this study aims to review the use of AI in the detection and differentiation of pancreatic space-occupying lesions and to compare AI-assisted endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with conventional EUS in terms of their detection capabilities.

Methods: Literature searches were conducted through PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and Embase to identify studies eligible for inclusion. Original articles, including observational studies, randomized control trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and case series specifically focused on AI-assisted EUS in adults, were included. Data were extracted and pooled, and a meta-analysis was conducted using Meta-xl. For results exhibiting significant heterogeneity, a random-effects model was employed; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was utilized.

Results: A total of 21 studies were included in the review with 4 studies pooled for a meta-analysis. A pooled accuracy of 93.6% (CI 90.4-96.8%) was found using the random-effects model on four studies that showed significant heterogeneity (P<0.05) in the Cochrane's Q test. Further, a pooled sensitivity of 93.9% (CI 92.4-95.3%) was found using a fixed-effects model on seven studies that showed no significant heterogeneity in the Cochrane's Q test. When it came to pooled specificity, a fixed-effects model was utilized in six studies that showed no significant heterogeneity in the Cochrane's Q test and determined as 93.1% (CI 90.7-95.4%). The pooled positive predictive value which was done using the random-effects model on six studies that showed significant heterogeneity was 91.6% (CI 87.3-95.8%). The pooled negative predictive value which was done using the random-effects model on six studies that showed significant heterogeneity was 93.6% (CI 90.4-96.8%).

Conclusion: AI-assisted EUS shows a high degree of accuracy in the detection and differentiation of pancreatic space-occupying lesions over conventional EUS. Its application may promote prompt and accurate diagnosis of pancreatic pathologies.