Prognostic value of RV abnormalities on CMR in patients with known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Wang, JieZhang, Jinquan
Hosadurg, Nisha
Iwanaga, Yoshitaka
Chen, Yuxin
Liu, Wei
Wan, Ke
Patel, Amit R
Wicks, Eleanor C
Gkoutos, Georgios V
Han, Yuchi
Chen, Yucheng
Publication date
2023-01-11
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Left ventricular abnormalities in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are associated with adverse cardiovascular events, whereas the prognostic value of right ventricular (RV) involvement found on cardiac magnetic resonance is unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to systematically assess the prognostic value of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and RV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in known or suspected CS. Methods: This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022302579). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies that evaluated the association between RVEF or RV LGE on clinical outcomes in CS. A composite endpoint of all-cause death, cardiovascular events, or sudden cardiac death (SCD) was used. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled risk ratio (RR) for these adverse events. The calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve with 95% CIs were weighted and summarized. Results: Eight studies including a total of 899 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 3.2 ± 0.7 years were included. The pooled RR of RV systolic dysfunction was 3.1 (95% CI: 1.7-5.5; P < 0.01) for composite events and 3.0 (95% CI: 1.3-7.0; P < 0.01) for SCD events. In addition, CS patients with RV LGE had a significant risk for composite events (RR: 4.8 [95% CI: 2.4-9.6]; P < 0.01) and a higher risk for SCD (RR: 9.5 [95% CI: 4.4-20.5]; P < 0.01) than patients without RV LGE. Furthermore, the pooled area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of RV LGE for identifying patients with CS who were at highest SCD risk were 0.8 (95% CI: 0.8-0.9), 69% (95% CI: 50%-84%), and 90% (95% CI: 70%-97%), respectively. Conclusions: In patients with known or suspected CS, RVEF and RV LGE were both associated with adverse events. Furthermore, RV LGE shows good discrimination in identifying CS patients at high risk of SCD.Citation
Wang J, Zhang J, Hosadurg N, Iwanaga Y, Chen Y, Liu W, Wan K, Patel AR, Wicks EC, Gkoutos GV, Han Y, Chen Y. Prognostic Value of RV Abnormalities on CMR in Patients With Known or Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Mar;16(3):361-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.11.012. Epub 2023 Jan 11Type
ArticleAdditional Links
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1936878XPMID
36752447Journal
JACC: Cardiovascular ImagingPublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.11.012