Head-to-head trial of pegunigalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta in patients with Fabry disease and deteriorating renal function: results from the 2-year randomised phase III BALANCE study
Author
Wallace, Eric LGoker-Alpan, Ozlem
Wilcox, William R
Holida, Myrl
Bernat, John
Longo, Nicola
Linhart, Aleš
Hughes, Derralynn A
Hopkin, Robert J
Tøndel, Camilla
Langeveld, Mirjam
Giraldo, Pilar
Pisani, Antonio
Germain, Dominique Paul
Mehta, Ankit
Deegan, Patrick B
Molnar, Maria Judit
Ortiz, Damara
Jovanovic, Ana
Muriello, Michael
Barshop, Bruce A
Kimonis, Virginia
Vujkovac, Bojan
Nowak, Albina
Geberhiwot, Tarekegn
Kantola, Ilkka
Knoll, Jasmine
Waldek, Stephen
Nedd, Khan
Karaa, Amel
Brill-Almon, Einat
Alon, Sari
Chertkoff, Raul
Rocco, Rossana
Sakov, Anat
Warnock, David G
Publication date
2023-11-08
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Pegunigalsidase alfa is a PEGylated α-galactosidase A enzyme replacement therapy. BALANCE (NCT02795676) assessed non-inferiority of pegunigalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta in adults with Fabry disease with an annualised estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope more negative than -2 mL/min/1.73 m2/year who had received agalsidase beta for ≥1 year. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 1 mg/kg pegunigalsidase alfa or agalsidase beta every 2 weeks for 2 years. The primary efficacy analysis assessed non-inferiority based on median annualised eGFR slope differences between treatment arms. Results: Seventy-seven patients received either pegunigalsidase alfa (n=52) or agalsidase beta (n=25). At baseline, mean (range) age was 44 (18-60) years, 47 (61%) patients were male, median eGFR was 74.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and median (range) eGFR slope was -7.3 (-30.5, 6.3) mL/min/1.73 m2/year. At 2 years, the difference between median eGFR slopes was -0.36 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, meeting the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Minimal changes were observed in lyso-Gb3 concentrations in both treatment arms at 2 years. Proportions of patients experiencing treatment-related adverse events and mild or moderate infusion-related reactions were similar in both groups, yet exposure-adjusted rates were 3.6-fold and 7.8-fold higher, respectively, with agalsidase beta than pegunigalsidase alfa. At the end of the study, neutralising antibodies were detected in 7 out of 47 (15%) pegunigalsidase alfa-treated patients and 6 out of 23 (26%) agalsidase beta-treated patients. There were no deaths. Conclusions: Based on rate of eGFR decline over 2 years, pegunigalsidase alfa was non-inferior to agalsidase beta. Pegunigalsidase alfa had lower rates of treatment-emergent adverse events and mild or moderate infusion-related reactions.Citation
Wallace EL, Goker-Alpan O, Wilcox WR, Holida M, Bernat J, Longo N, Linhart A, Hughes DA, Hopkin RJ, Tøndel C, Langeveld M, Giraldo P, Pisani A, Germain DP, Mehta A, Deegan PB, Molnar MJ, Ortiz D, Jovanovic A, Muriello M, Barshop BA, Kimonis V, Vujkovac B, Nowak A, Geberhiwot T, Kantola I, Knoll J, Waldek S, Nedd K, Karaa A, Brill-Almon E, Alon S, Chertkoff R, Rocco R, Sakov A, Warnock DG. Head-to-head trial of pegunigalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta in patients with Fabry disease and deteriorating renal function: results from the 2-year randomised phase III BALANCE study. J Med Genet. 2024 May 21;61(6):520-530. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109445.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
http://jmg.bmj.com/PMID
37940383Journal
Journal of Medical GeneticsPublisher
BMJ Publishing Groupae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/jmg-2023-109445