Eight pruning deep learning models for low storage and high-speed COVID-19 computed tomography lung segmentation and heatmap-based lesion localization: A multicenter study using COVLIAS 2.0
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Agarwal MAgarwal S
Saba L
Chabert GL
Gupta S
Carriero A
Pasche A
Danna P
Mehmedovic A
Faa G
Shrivastava S
Jain K
Jain H
Jujaray T
Singh IM
Turk M
Chadha PS
Johri AM
Khanna NN
Mavrogeni S
Laird JR
Sobel DW
Miner M
Balestrieri A
Sfikakis PP
Tsoulfas G
Misra DP
Agarwal V
Kitas GD
Teji JS
Al-Maini M
Dhanjil SK
Nicolaides A
Sharma A
Rathore V
Fatemi M
Alizad A
Krishnan PR
Yadav RR
Nagy F
Kincses ZT
Ruzsa Z
Naidu S
Viskovic K
Kalra MK
Suri JS.
Publication date
2022-06-25Subject
Communicable diseases
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background:�COVLIAS 1.0: an automated lung segmentation was designed for COVID-19 diagnosis. It has issues related to storage space and speed. This study shows that COVLIAS 2.0 uses pruned AI (PAI) networks for improving both storage and speed, wiliest high performance on lung segmentation and lesion localization. Method:�ology: The proposed study uses multicenter ?9,000 CT slices from two different nations, namely, CroMed from Croatia (80 patients, experimental data), and NovMed from Italy (72 patients, validation data). We hypothesize that by using pruning and evolutionary optimization algorithms, the size of the AI models can be reduced significantly, ensuring optimal performance. Eight different pruning techniques (i) differential evolution (DE), (ii) genetic algorithm (GA), (iii) particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO), and (iv) whale optimization algorithm (WO) in two deep learning frameworks (i) Fully connected network (FCN) and (ii) SegNet were designed. COVLIAS 2.0 was validated using "Unseen NovMed" and benchmarked against MedSeg. Statistical tests for stability and reliability were also conducted. Results:�Pruning algorithms (i) FCN-DE, (ii) FCN-GA, (iii) FCN-PSO, and (iv) FCN-WO showed improvement in storage by 92.4%, 95.3%, 98.7%, and 99.8% respectively when compared against solo FCN, and (v) SegNet-DE, (vi) SegNet-GA, (vii) SegNet-PSO, and (viii) SegNet-WO showed improvement by 97.1%, 97.9%, 98.8%, and 99.2% respectively when compared against solo SegNet. AUC > 0.94 (p < 0.0001) on CroMed and > 0.86 (p < 0.0001) on NovMed data set for all eight EA model. PAI <0.25 s per image. DenseNet-121-based Grad-CAM heatmaps showed validation on glass ground opacity lesions. Conclusions:�Eight PAI networks that were successfully validated are five times faster, storage efficient, and could be used in clinical settings.Citation
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Jul;146:105571. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105571. Epub 2022 May 21.Type
ArticlePMID
35751196Publisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105571