Single-centre review of the management of intra-thoracic oesophageal perforation in a tertiary oesophageal unit: paradigm shift, short- and long-term outcomes over 15 years.
Author
Charalampakis, VasileiosCardoso, Victor Roth
Sharples, Alistair
Khalid, Maha
Dickerson, Luke
Wiggins, Tom
Gkoutos, Georgios V
Tucker, Olga
Super, Paul
Richardson, Martin
Nijjar, Rajwinder
Singhal, Rishi

Publication date
2022-10-07
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Oesophageal perforation is an uncommon surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. The timing and type of intervention is crucial and there has been a major paradigm shift towards minimal invasive management over the last 15 years. Herein, we review our management of spontaneous and iatrogenic oesophageal perforations and assess the short- and long-term outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting with intra-thoracic oesophageal perforation between January 2004 and Dec 2020 in a single tertiary hospital. Results: Seventy-four patients were identified with oesophageal perforations: 58.1% were male; mean age of 68.28 ± 13.67 years. Aetiology was spontaneous in 42 (56.76%), iatrogenic in 29 (39.2%) and foreign body ingestion/related to trauma in 3 (4.1%). The diagnosis was delayed in 29 (39.2%) cases for longer than 24 h. There was change in the primary diagnostic modality over the period of this study with CT being used for diagnosis for 19 of 20 patients (95%). Initial management of the oesophageal perforation included a surgical intervention in 34 [45.9%; primary closure in 28 (37.8%), resection in 6 (8.1%)], endoscopic stenting in 18 (24.3%) and conservative management in 22 (29.7%) patients. On multivariate analysis, there was an effect of pathology (malignant vs. benign; p = 0.003) and surgical treatment as first line (p = 0.048) on 90-day mortality. However, at 1-year and overall follow-up, time to presentation (≤ 24 h vs. > 24 h) remained the only significant variable (p = 0.017 & p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusion: Oesophageal perforation remains a condition with high mortality. The paradigm shift in our tertiary unit suggests the more liberal use of CT to establish an earlier diagnosis and a higher rate of oesophageal stenting as a primary management option for iatrogenic perforations. Time to diagnosis and management continues to be the most critical variable in the overall outcome.Citation
Charalampakis V, Cardoso VR, Sharples A, Khalid M, Dickerson L, Wiggins T, Gkoutos GV, Tucker O, Super P, Richardson M, Nijjar R, Singhal R. Single-centre review of the management of intra-thoracic oesophageal perforation in a tertiary oesophageal unit: paradigm shift, short- and long-term outcomes over 15 years. Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1710-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09682-0. Epub 2022 Oct 7Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://link.springer.com/journal/464PMID
36207647Journal
Surgical EndoscopyPublisher
Springerae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00464-022-09682-0