Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGroenland, Eline H
dc.contributor.authorDasgupta, Indranil
dc.contributor.authorVisseren, Frank L J
dc.contributor.authorvan der Elst, Kim C M
dc.contributor.authorLorde, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Alexander J
dc.contributor.authorBots, Michiel L
dc.contributor.authorSpiering, Wilko
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T12:08:07Z
dc.date.available2023-12-22T12:08:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-27
dc.identifier.citationGroenland EH, Dasgupta I, Visseren FLJ, van der Elst KCM, Lorde N, Lawson AJ, Bots ML, Spiering W. Clinical characteristics do not reliably identify non-adherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Blood Press. 2022 Dec;31(1):178-186. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2022.2104215en_US
dc.identifier.issn0803-7051
dc.identifier.eissn1651-1999
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08037051.2022.2104215
dc.identifier.pmid35899383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/3291
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Chemical adherence testing is a reliable method to assess adherence to antihypertensive drugs. However, it is expensive and has limited availability in clinical practice. To reduce the number and costs of chemical adherence tests, we aimed to develop and validate a clinical screening tool to identify patients with a low probability of non-adherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Materials and methods: In 495 patients with uncontrolled hypertension referred to the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU), the Netherlands, a penalised logistic regression model including seven pre-specified easy-to-measure clinical variables was derived to estimate the probability of non-adherence. Non-adherence was defined as not detecting at least one of the prescribed antihypertensive drugs in plasma or urine. Model performance and test characteristics were evaluated in 240 patients with uncontrolled hypertension referred to the Heartlands Hospital, United Kingdom. Results: Prevalence of non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs was 19% in the UMCU and 44% in the Heartlands Hospital population. After recalibration of the model's intercept, predicted probabilities agreed well with observed frequencies. The c-statistic of the model was 0.63 (95%CI 0.53-0.72). Predicted probability cut-off values of 15%-22.5% prevented testing in 5%-15% of the patients, carrying sensitivities between 97% (64-100) and 90% (80-95), and negative predictive values between 74% (10-99) and 70% (50-85). Conclusion: The combination of seven clinical variables is not sufficient to reliably discriminate adherent from non-adherent individuals to safely reduce the number of chemical adherence tests. This emphasises the complex nature of non-adherence behaviour and thus the need for objective chemical adherence tests in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iblo20en_US
dc.subjectVascular diseasesen_US
dc.subjectNephrology/Renal medicineen_US
dc.titleClinical characteristics do not reliably identify non-adherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertensionen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleBlood Pressure
dc.source.volume31
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage178
dc.source.endpage186
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorDasgupta, Indranil
dc.contributor.trustauthorLawson, Alexander
dc.contributor.departmentRenal Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPathologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleHealthcare Scientistsen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record