Are Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures Associated With Inferior Clinical Outcomes Following Non-operative Management? A Systematic Review.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Thurston, DanielJordan, Robert W
Thangarajah, Tanujan
Haque, Aziz
Woodmass, Jarret
D'Alessandro, Peter
Malik, Shahbaz S
Publication date
2024-01-26Subject
Orthopaedics
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Management of displaced distal clavicle fractures remains a topic of discussion due to notoriously high non-union rates, but there is little documented in the literature as to what effect this may have on patient-reported function. The aim of this systematic review was to look at non-operative management following displaced distal clavicle fractures to determine union rates, complications and patient reported outcome measures. Method: A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted, according to PRISMA guidelines. Clinical studies which included a cohort of non-operatively managed displaced distal clavicle fractures, and reported on union rate, complications, and patient-reported functional scores, were included. Results: 11 studies were eligible for inclusion (2 randomized controlled trials, 1 prospective non-comparative cohort study, 5 retrospective comparative cohort studies, and 3 case series) with a total of 779 patients included in this review. Average union rate was 63.2% (22.2% - 94.4%) in non-operatively managed patients, compared with 96.3% (87.9% - 100%) in operatively managed patients. The Constant-Murley Score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand Score were the most frequently used outcome measure tools. No study demonstrated any significant difference in any outcome measure when comparing non-operative with operative treatment. Complication rate (including non-union) in non-operatively managed patients was 45.1%, with 11.1% requiring delayed surgery. Average complication rate in the operatively managed groups was 41.2%, with 40.1% requiring a second operation. Conclusion: Non-operative management of displaced distal clavicle fractures results in higher non-union rates, but shoulder function remains excellent, and risk of complications and delayed surgery are low. Decision-making must take into account patient factors and expectations to provide high-quality, individualized care. Keywords: clavicle fracture; conservative management; distal clavicle; functional outcomes; lateral clavicle; non-operative management; shoulder function.Citation
Thurston D, Jordan RW, Thangarajah T, Haque A, Woodmass J, D'Alessandro P, Malik SS. Are Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures Associated With Inferior Clinical Outcomes Following Non-operative Management? A Systematic Review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jan 26:S1058-2746(24)00057-0. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.006. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38281678.Type
ArticlePMID
38281678Publisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.006