A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases.
Affiliation
University of Birmingham; Aston University; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustPublication date
2021-08-09Subject
Ophthalmology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can provide valuable insights on the impact of a disease or treatment on a patient's health-related quality of life. In ophthalmology, particularly in dry eye disease (DED) and ocular surface disease (OSD), it is unclear whether the available PROMs were developed using comprehensive guidelines. To address this, we evaluated the methodological quality of studies assessing the psychometric properties of PROMs in DED and OSD [PROSPERO registration number CRD42019142328]. Methods: Four databases were searched; reference list and citation searching of included studies was also conducted. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to appraise the quality of the studies evaluating the psychometric properties of PROMs used in DED and OSD. Results: The search strategy (S3 Table) retrieved 5,761 records, 573 duplicates were removed, 5,188 abstracts were screened and 127 full-text articles were retrieved for further review. Of these, 118 full-text articles did not meet the eligibility criteria and were excluded. Reference list and citation searching, identified an additional 8 articles bringing the total numbers of papers reviewed to 17. In general, psychometric properties such as content validity, measurement error and structural validity were not assessed by the studies included in this review. Studies reviewing The Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) presented with the highest quality scores together with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Conclusions: The quality of studies evaluating PROMs in DED and OSD was considered using the COSMIN standards. The majority of the studies evaluating PROMs included in this review did not meet the recommended COSMIN criteria and the quality of the PROMs evaluated is not assured. Further evaluation of their psychometric properties is required if these are going to be used in clinical practice or research.Citation
Recchioni, A., Aiyegbusi, O. L., Cruz-Rivera, S., Rauz, S., & Slade, A. (2021). A systematic review assessing the quality of patient reported outcomes measures in dry eye diseases. PloS one, 16(8), e0253857.Type
ArticlePMID
34370748Journal
PLoS ONEPublisher
Public Library of Scienceae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pone.0253857