Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlah, Karl
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-29T09:53:10Z
dc.date.available2024-02-29T09:53:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.identifier.citationOláh K. Caesarean myomectomy: TE or not TE? BJOG. 2018 Mar;125(4):501. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14807. Epub 2017 Aug 30. PMID: 28678389.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328
dc.identifier.eissn1471-0528
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1471-0528.14807
dc.identifier.pmid28678389
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/3815
dc.description.abstractOver the last 5 years there has been a plethora of studies looking at the complications and feasibility of performing myomectomy at the time of caesarean section (Li et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:183–6; Akkurt et al. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:1855–60). Few if any of these studies have come from the UK or the USA, and while the commandment ‘thou should never touch a fibroid at a caesarean section’ seems to have originated in the developed world, the rules are being questioned elsewhere, with results that universally show, despite the expected increase in operating time, no significant increase in morbidity besides an increase need for blood transfusion and, most importantly, no excess of hysterectomy being required.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectGynaecologyen_US
dc.titleCaesarean myomectomy: TE or not TE?en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorOlah, K
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationSouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trusten_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record