Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNaffouje, Samer A
dc.contributor.authorAli, Muhammed A
dc.contributor.authorKamarajah, Sivesh K
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Bradley
dc.contributor.authorSalti, George I
dc.contributor.authorDahdaleh, Fadi
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T15:13:28Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T15:13:28Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-19
dc.identifier.citationNaffouje SA, Ali MA, Kamarajah SK, White B, Salti GI, Dahdaleh F. Assessment of Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jun;26(6):1286-1297. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05213-9. Epub 2022 Apr 19en_US
dc.identifier.issn1091-255X
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4626
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11605-021-05213-9
dc.identifier.pmid35441331
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/3924
dc.description.abstractBackground: Outcomes of rectal adenocarcinoma vary considerably. Composite "textbook oncologic outcome" (TOO) is a single metric that estimates optimal clinical performance for cancer surgery. Methods: Patients with stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent single-agent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and proctectomy within 5-12 weeks were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). TOO was defined as achievement of negative distal and circumferential resection margin (CRM), retrieval of ≥ 12 nodes, no 90-day mortality, and length of stay (LOS) < 75th percentile of corresponding year's range. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of TOO. Results: Among 318,225 patients, 8869 met selection criteria. Median age was 62 years (IQR 54-71), and 5550 (62.6%) were males. Low anterior resection was the most common procedure (LAR, 6,037 (68.1%) and 3084 (34.8%) were treated at a high-volume center (≥ 20 rectal resections/year). TOO was achieved in 3967 patients (44.7%). Several components of TOO were achieved commonly, including negative CRM (87.4%), no 90-day mortality (98.0%), no readmission (93.0%), and no prolonged hospitalization (78.8%). Logistic regression identified increasing age, non-private insurance, low-volume centers, open approach, Black race, Charlson score ≥ 3, and abdominoperineal resection (APR) as predictors of failure to achieve TOO. Over time, TOOs were attained more commonly which correlated with increased minimally invasive surgery (MIS) adoption. TOO achievement was associated with improved survival. Conclusions: Rectal adenocarcinoma patients achieve TOO uncommonly. Treatment at high-volume centers and MIS approach were among modifiable factors associated with TOO in this study.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://link.springer.com/journal/11605en_US
dc.rights© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
dc.subjectOncology. Pathology.en_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titleAssessment of textbook oncologic outcomes following proctectomy for rectal cancer.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
dc.source.volume26
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.beginpage1286
dc.source.endpage1297
dc.source.countryUnited States
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorKamarajah, Sivesh K
dc.contributor.departmentSurgeryen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record