Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Perkins, Gavin DCallaway, Clifton W
Haywood, Kirstie
Neumar, Robert W
Lilja, Gisela
Rowland, Matthew J
Sawyer, Kelly N
Skrifvars, Markus B
Nolan, Jerry P
Publication date
2021-08-26
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
As more people are surviving cardiac arrest, focus needs to shift towards improving neurological outcomes and quality of life in survivors. Brain injury after resuscitation, a common sequela following cardiac arrest, ranges in severity from mild impairment to devastating brain injury and brainstem death. Effective strategies to minimise brain injury after resuscitation include early intervention with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation, restoration of normal physiology, and targeted temperature management. It is important to identify people who might have a poor outcome, to enable informed choices about continuation or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. Multimodal prediction guidelines seek to avoid premature withdrawal in those who might survive with a good neurological outcome, or prolonging treatment that might result in survival with severe disability. Approximately one in three admitted to intensive care will survive, many of whom will need intensive, tailored rehabilitation after discharge to have the best outcomes.Citation
Perkins GD, Callaway CW, Haywood K, Neumar RW, Lilja G, Rowland MJ, Sawyer KN, Skrifvars MB, Nolan JP. Brain injury after cardiac arrest. Lancet. 2021 Oct 2;398(10307):1269-1278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00953-3. Epub 2021 Aug 26.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34454687/PMID
34454687Journal
The LancetPublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00953-3